Heads Up, Canon 7, low BIN

would the canon 7 and leica m5 be comparable?

Kind of. The M5 used a CdS photocell located inside the camera, while the Canon 7 used a selenium cell located on the front top plate. With the M5, while metering, you matched needles in the viewfinder. With the 7, you read the suggested aperture off a little window on top of the top plate and transferred that reading to the lens. Of course the M5 has the M-bayonet mount, while the 7 is LTM.

Jim B.
 
Kind of. The M5 used a CdS photocell located inside the camera, while the Canon 7 used a selenium cell located on the front top plate. With the M5, while metering, you matched needles in the viewfinder. With the 7, you read the suggested aperture off a little window on top of the top plate and transferred that reading to the lens. Of course the M5 has the M-bayonet mount, while the 7 is LTM.

Jim B.

thanks!
i just did some quick research on the 7...i'd like to pick up a good rangefinder but it needs to be cheap...the 7 might work if i could find one with a good working meter.
 
The 7 is a nice camera. Very solid with a nice quality feel. Since it uses projected frame lines like in a Leica M, you don't see any of the viewfinder flare that you at times find in a Canon P (which uses reflected frame lines). Plus seeing the focal length number of the viewfinder frame you select is a nice touch. The meters appear to have aged well. Mine is really quite accurate, and it has never seen a CLA. It is not very light-sensitive though so take along a hand-held meter when it gets dim. They made a ton of Canon 7s' so finding one is usually no big deal. Still, if you can check one out in person before buying, do so.

Jim B.
 
Strangely enough, most of the Canon 7 cameras I have come across have good meters, perhaps 80%. The later Canon 7S had a cds meter, but in my experience, these are less reliable than the old selenium types.
 
Back
Top Bottom