Help me decide! Down to 2 cameras

K

kid_a

Established
Local time
8:27 PM
Joined
Feb 18, 2009
Messages
100
Location
Edmonton, Alberta
View My Gallery
Hey all, so I bought my first rangefinder about a month ago. It's a beautiful Nikon S2 with an excellent 5cm f1,4 lens. Great condition, a dream to use. I've completely fallen in love with the rangefinder way of shooting, I love developping my own film, I just really like everything about it. However, I've run into the realization that the Nikon SC mount lenses are quite hard to come by. I've decided to move into an M mount system.

These are the 2 cameras I have it narrowed down to:

a) Voigtlander Bessa R2M Anniversary Presentation Kit with Heliar 50mm f/2 Classic. This is brand new, with warrantee, presentation box, everything. I've read good things about this lens, seems sharp, simple, relatively small.

Price: $800USD. This seems like a very good price to me, almost $200 less than everywhere else I've seen, and it's a reputable dealer. I figure if I bought this, and didn't like it.. I should easily be able to resell and not lose money, maybe even make money. Is this accurate?

b) Voigtlander R2A with Bessa Winder, and Hexanon 50mm f/2. Virtually the same body as long as I'm responsible with batteries. The lens seems to be in a league of it's own frmo what I'm reading. Seems quite incredible for the price. This camera is used, but in great condition. The lens is virtually like new in box. Comes with box/papers, it's never been used. Of course this one has no warrantee.

Price: $890USD. Prise seems fair. I'm not sure about the used prices on these items, but this seems pretty normal. Is this accurate?

Which way would you go? It's virtually the same camera.. so it really comes down to the lenses, and the fact that one body has the trigger winder on it. Sway me one way or the other because I really can't! haha.

Cheers,

Dylan
 
The functional difference is down to aperture priority AE, which the R3A has and the R3M does not.
The R3A is battery dependent because of this and some people find that a factor, I do not.
 
dazedgonebye said:
The functional difference is down to aperture priority AE, which the R3A has and the R3M does not.
The R3A is battery dependent because of this and some people find that a factor, I do not.
Click to expand...

I do not either, does it make a difference shooting?

The way I see it is this: If you are responsible with batteries, always having spares and whatnot, it makes no real difference. You won't run out, and I suppose have AP can only be a good thing. If you don't use it, you can just ignore it and use it manually.
 
How about neither Bessa and more lenses (not 50 mm again) for the Nikon S2?

Why have multiple cameras with near identical f = 50 mm length lenses?
 
uhligfd said:
How about neither Bessa and more lenses (not 50 mm again) for the Nikon S2?

Why have multiple cameras with near identical f = 50 mm length lenses?
Click to expand...

I'll be selling the S2 right when I get the new camera, so I won't have multiple 50's. I'm nto a huge fan of 50mm to be honest, but the deals are there 😉 And it's MUCH MUCH easier to find a wider 28 or 35 for the M mount than it is to find one for the SC mount.
 
I've had both a Bessa R*A and an R*M, and they are comparable in every way. I prefer the "piano" finish on the manual cameras, but I now own the R4A and think it's great. I use AE 95% of the time and the metering is highly effective and easy to compensate for in tricky situations. Batteries last a while and are easily found at any drugstore.

I used to have the Heliar Classic as well, and I think it's an excellent lens. The Hexanon is said to be really good too, though.
 
i prefer ae cameras and do not live in fear of battery dependency.
the bessa cameras have accurate meters and once you figure out how they work for you there should be no problems.

i might search out a sperate body and a 35 mm lens, especially if you don't care for the 50 fov.

joe
 
Bill Harrison said:
You seem happy with the Nikon, have you used a Bessa? I'd rent one to make sure, if you haven't.
Click to expand...

I'm very happy with its performance, but not happy with the availability of accessories and lenses. I got it for a good deal too so I won't lose anything by selling.

Also, I figure if I don't like the Bessa, I'll be able to sell the anniversary kit for at least $800 USD, and also not lose much, if anything, if I went the Hexanon route.

Am I way off on this? The $800USD seems like a steal to me, for a brand new unit, boxed, from a store.
 
back alley said:
i prefer ae cameras and do not live in fear of battery dependency.
the bessa cameras have accurate meters and once you figure out how they work for you there should be no problems.

i might search out a sperate body and a 35 mm lens, especially if you don't care for the 50 fov.

joe
Click to expand...

Well, I can get the R2A from the guy for $450USD. I could pair it with a 28 or a 35.. something fast. I guess eventually I'll want a wider and a 50, so I think I'll stick to buying a kit, just to save a few bucks. Starving student budget, y'know 😉
 
Brian Sweeney said:
Get a Voigtlander 28mm in Nikon Mount. Or a 21mm. For a cheap 35mm, get a Jupiter-12.

http://cameraquest.com/inventor.htm
Click to expand...

Lets forget about the Nikon. I've convinced myself that the M system is where I should be, and I don't need more options confusing my head! haha 🙂

The S2 has a 1:1 viewfinder, which is great for focussing longer, faster lenses, but the fact that I need a viewfinder for wider stuff bothers me. The R2A's framelines will accomodate a 35, which is close enough to 28 for me if I go that route.

Another big factor is that I have a store within a daytrip/s distance (Calgary), that often carries M mount lenses. So when I want to see them, buy them and not pay shipping, or just drool over them.. they're there. SC mount lenses are few and far between, and once cameraquest sells out, they're gone. I don't see prices going down at all, especially once they're all out of retailers hands.
 
kid_a said:
Lets forget about the Nikon. I've convinced myself that the M system is where I should be, and I don't need more options confusing my head! haha 🙂

The S2 has a 1:1 viewfinder, which is great for focussing longer, faster lenses, but the fact that I need a viewfinder for wider stuff bothers me. The R2A's framelines will accomodate a 35, which is close enough to 28 for me if I go that route.

Another big factor is that I have a store within a daytrip/s distance (Calgary), that often carries M mount lenses. So when I want to see them, buy them and not pay shipping, or just drool over them.. they're there. SC mount lenses are few and far between, and once cameraquest sells out, they're gone. I don't see prices going down at all, especially once they're all out of retailers hands.
Click to expand...
To avoid more trauma and sleepless nights - I'd recomend you get a Canon G10....happy shooting! 🙂
 
Kid A, get an R4A. You don't need accessory viewfinders all the way down to 21mm--it is the only rangefinder camera ever made that accomodates all those wides without an extra finder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rob-F
AI is helping me decide whether to buy a Leica M10!
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Rob-F
Rob-F
Bololoco
Cameras to fix
2
Replies
31
Views
1K
fub
fub
J
Help with GW690 (winding mechanism)
Replies
4
Views
240
jcapunta
J
B
Two Newbie Viewfinder questions
Replies
4
Views
641
brianentz
B
L
How to replace shutter curtain on Fed 5
Replies
17
Views
298
lotech
L
Back
Top Bottom