Help with lens choice, please

Hi Phil, I had no remarkable flare problems or any other notable problems. It was an all round performer and has a lovely weight/feel/construction. The built-in lens hood is not that bad either..!
Avenon: Mike, I tried one in in a camera shop in downtown Kiev last week....fine looking lens on the rd-1, low vignetting, excellent performance edge to edge. Its a shame they stopped production. They are very difficult to find now. The one in Kiev was priced at $900which I felt was a little high...Still waiting for the Biogon 21)
 
Well at this moment in time I know where 3 of them are for about
the same sort of price as I paid for mine.
I could probably be persuaded to help someone get one from overhere.

Mike.
 
Mike-
Any room on this bandwagon for me? ;)

BTW a Pasoptik 21/2.8 (I think it's a rebranded Avenon) went on UK ebay last month for about £240. Looked nice.

cheers
Phil
 
Last edited:
Vincenzo... I just tried shooting in the living room, nearly into the sun. Sadly, erased the files! However, there is considerable veiling across the pic, like the old 105 Nikkor P used to do. It's not unattractive, but really cuts the contrast. A good lens shade would fix it, but the guy who didn't like the Hexagon like to shoot into the light, and I can see he would have had a problem!

As for me, I'm going to see if this lens grows on me over the next few days. I do like the build - the shape seems a bit more comfortable than the 'cron. Images are reallly nice; so it's just a question of seeing if the flare's a problem in real life situations. Let's hope for some nice weather this weekend!

cheers
Phil
 
Jim Watts said:
Phil & Vincenzo,
U.K list price for the Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 is £745 +vat = £875.38
Plus 240 +vat = £282.00 for the 21mm finder. You would not need this finder for the R-D1 of course (but the VC 21D) and if you use the lens on a full frame 35mm body as well then the VC full frame finder would be a cheaper bet.

I am interested in the Zeiss 21mm or possibly the 25mm. Even though I am quite happy with the VC 25mm the fact that it couples and is an extra stop is attractive. I handled both at Focus and they are well built and smooth to focus, but they woundn't allow me to take pictures with them so I am also awaiting Sean's report.

I hope the street prices turn out to be a little lower, butI expect it will not be by much as Hasslebad is the distributer.
Click to expand...

Hi Jim,

I'm hoping to have a test copy of the 50 in a couple of weeks but I may not see the 21 to test for quite awhile. Sorry bout that...

Cheers,

Sean
 
Sean, I was able to try out a copy of the new 35mm Biogon late yesterday afternoon. A friend bought one and wanted to verify it worked properly via my R-D1. (This camera has made me very popular with my two RF-shooting friends. "I think my [insert lens name here] is flaring too much...can I take some test shots with your Epson?" "Just in case I get an R-D1 I wanna see how well all my lenses work on it. Can I borrow it for a couple days?" It's a wonder I ever get to use it.) Judging by the photos we took I'd say the Biogon performs very much like the 50mm Planar. You get a wider view but the same image characteristics are there. Consistent performance across the frame even at f/2, high but not hard contrast, smooth out-of-focus rendition. I really liked what I saw.

-Dave-
 
Hi Dave,

Thanks for the info. I've been thinking that Zeiss might try for a "family" look with these lenses, just as there is a "family look" to the 35/1.4 ASPH and 50/1.4 ASPH.

When I looked at your Kobalux 21 samples, they were JPEGs right? Might I be able to look at a couple RAW files from you? E-mail me if you get a chance, please.

Cheers,

Sean
 
Sean, I've found my copy of the Kobalux front-focuses on my R-D1. After my initial okay but not great results from the combo (with some pics posted here and a couple full-size JPEGs e-mailed to you) I used the lens on my M2, with much better results. So I tried again on the R-D1, tweaking the focus distance, and discovered the problem. It's most evident at distance...with the Kobalux set at infinity, as it was for most of my example pics, the point-of-focus is noticeably in front of where it should be. I've tried a few different LTM-to-M adapters with no change in behavior. This particular lens just doesn't get along with this particular camera.

-Dave-
 
I see...so that's why they looked soft to me. It will be good to look at some samples form other Kobalux examples to see how widespread the issue may be.

Cheers,

Sean
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom