here is my x100 review ...

paulfish4570

Veteran
Local time
3:10 AM
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
9,816
Location
Lapine, in deep south Alabama
... and you will not find any geek-speak in it. 🙂

1) the cheese: the strap that came with the camera is slap-out cheesy. it works OK, but it has not a molecule of leather on it, nor a good non-slip inner layer for the shoulder. for kit this expensive, you'd think fuji could at least provide a re-branded Optech. the camera-protection tabs ARE leather and work beautifully with the triangle rings. the only other piece of cheese is a poorly seated screw on the base plate. i don't have a phillips head driver small enough to unscrew it and seat it properly, but i will get one.

2) i am sorely left-brained, so there is little logic to me on digi-cam controls and menus. i have to learn to operate such things by doing. i have found this pretty easy to do on the x100, but it will take me a while to figure out everything this cam is capable of in my hands. might i say it is intuitive? as close as it gets for mr. poetry-brain. i could make photos straight out of the box.

3) my bride had to do the firmware upgrade for me. it looked simple, but i kept missing a step in the instructions. she went right through it like a hot knife through lightly salted fresh dairy butter. focusing seems snappier after the upgrade.

4) i am not much of a close-up or macro guy (i lose all sense of composition inside a meter), but i do like to get in close for portraits and details. this is where i had difficulty from the camera itself - before upgrade. it had trouble focusing on a smallish subject in a busy background. the AE tends - pre- and post-upgrade - to overexpose the close-up subject, as it seems to compensate too far for the background. the little exposure compensation wheel takes care of the tendency to overexpose. i figure most of you guys already know about such things, but i had to learn by doing. i reckon a user could push some buttons and find a spot meter setting, then make a customized setting for such. customized settings are something it will take a while for me to settle upon.

5) the camera feels good in my smallish hands. my right thumb does seem to accidentally find the shutter and exposure compensation wheels every now and then. paying attention to the viewfinder info lets me know if i have done so. i think i will get one of those little thumb-up devices as shown by someone here on the forum to keep things simple.

6) the viewfinder really is a wonder, whether optical or EV. i seldom shoot in stygian conditions, but my limited use in a restaurant was right on as long as i remembered to lock focus before re-composing. but this is necessary inside or outside.

7) film simulation and iso settings are extremely easy to change. even at iso 3200/BW, there appears to be no "grain." the yellow and red filter settings give high iso settings a little edge that i like in my BW photos. as for color, well, i am partially red-green color blind with zero experience with fuji slide/color films, which are the color film simulation settings. i do like the look of the astia setting, and i do not fool with color PP. as for RAW, i haven't figured out the conversion business yet. then again, how would i know if color is "correct" in PP? ergo, i pick astia or provia or velvia and an iso for color. now, i do intend to get lightroom or SEP for my BW work.

8) i find the x100 to be very barnack-ish in handling, and very bessa r2m-ish in viewing. the x100 is lighter than my IIIf with cv 50/2.5 color skopar mounted. the x100 doesn't yet dance on my fingers like a barnack ballerina, but i think it will with use. the viewfinder on my bessa R2m IS very x100-like.

9) the 35/2 lens is superb. i think it the best lens i have ever used but that ain't saying much compared to you guys. it gives edges that i like in my photos, a 3D effect.

10) i'd like to have a 50mm equivalent x100, too.

11) that is it for now. i have edited above to correct a mistake i made in the macro focus tick box. photos and more comments below.
 
Last edited:
in this photo, i had to bracket to find an exposure that did not wash out portions of the sprite. -1 did the trick. shot was made at f2. a 100 percent crop shows her eye to be exactly in focus. astia/iso400 setting, -1.

DSCF0056rff.jpg
 
Last edited:
as a person who only used AF film cams in the ’80s and '90s, i can say that on a percentage basis, i ruined far more pictures to missed focusing then than i do on the x100--only about a half dozen in about 200 pictures. in decent light at normal distance, the AF speed is as good as any other digicam ive used over the past ten years, though i focus exclusively in MF mode using the AFL button. it does, as many other cams, have difficulty close focusing, though much less so if you use the evf vs ovf. however at close distances when you are dealing only with critical focus within a very small space range, the pure MF focusing method is absolutely fine, and the ultra long throw that renders mf impossible across the entire distance plane actually works in one's favor in tight focusing contexts.

sure the x100 may have some quirks and annoyances--all tools do in some way. but the spectacular files it produces, the constant 3d effect paul alluded to, the incredible low light high iso performance, make almost any annoyance worth putting up with. i've had the cam only a week, but now i'm seeing that it makes even ordinary pictures just pop off the screen; stuff i'd ordinarily just toss off, i now want to keep. as joe dimaggio said, 'sure she's hard to live with, but at the end of the day, i go home with marilyn monroe'.
 
Last edited:
Rob, that is a tough question. if i had to forsake all but one cam among those in my possession, the nikon f2 would be no. 1 for pure toughness' sake, the iiif for pure aesthetics' sake. the x100 would be no. 2.
it is so easy to get a technically excellent photo with the x100 - and know immediately that i have done so. with film, ya gotta wait ... 🙂
 
paul i wonder if you'd have the same exposure issue with the standard provia setting. ive found velvia not as reliable, it seems to clip shadows and handles highlights differently as well. you could try, as i did, a custom saved velvia setting with separate settings for highlight and shadow tone handling.
 
boy, ry, that sounds complicated. 🙂 i have just been messing around with velvia and provia. i reckon when i shoot color seriously, it will be the astia setting. for black and white, i have found so far that straight iso 400 bw is a go-to setting; iso 3200 with red filter for sky-heavy stuff.
there is so much trial and error fun to be done with settings ... 🙂
i would like to know what the white balance thing is for.
 
I shoot raw and with this I leave the settings on default and make any adjustments in Lightroom 3. The advantage of LR is that it is non destructive in that you can roll back or reset to the original file even if you have used one of the many presets available. Not everyone likes post production but for me it has elements of the analogue darkroom workflow on which I cut my teeth.
 
I shoot raw and with this I leave the settings on default and make any adjustments in Lightroom 3. The advantage of LR is that it is non destructive in that you can roll back or reset to the original file even if you have used one of the many presets available. Not everyone likes post production but for me it has elements of the analogue darkroom workflow on which I cut my teeth.

+1 on using raw

If there is one fault with the camera for me it is that the exposure compensation is too easy to move. I don't know how many times I forgot to double check to make sure the setting did not get moved after taking the camera out of my bag :bang:

Shooting raw has given me at least a chance in saving the picture. But I have been shooting in raw since my first Nikon dslr, so that I can have more info to control what final picture will look like as well.

I also tend to use non-destructive approach. Instead of lr3, I ended up using aperture for this.

Gary
 
Paul, a nice realistic review. Have been growing a little tired of the "Reasons I am selling my X100" posts. Glad that X100 has found a good home. Love mine and use it in the areas where M9 is weak, high ISO and close ups.
 
Back
Top Bottom