Hexanon 28/2.8 : A surprise at f16 also!

[Krosya]

I guess I'd have to see what that "new" lens would be like - sharpness wise. But , as you say - if you could never understand something, in this case - "clinical" sharpness - what does that matter? Some people dont understand bokeh, or other things. If you dont see it - why bother? Right?

 

[oldoc]

Maybe after I get a little cash from MY sales.
I can't BELIEVE your stuff is still for sale, Krosya.
You sold the one I really wanted!!!

 

[leicashot]

I guess I'd have to see what that "new" lens would be like - sharpness wise. But , as you say - if you could never understand something, in this case - "clinical" sharpness - what does that matter? Some people dont understand bokeh, or other things. If you dont see it - why bother? Right?

Very true. I have to say, I've had friends with Hexar lenses and never used/owned them myself, but I'd have no issues using them, regardless of the sharpness, as long as it 'lOOks' sharp, enough😀

 

[Krosya]

Maybe after I get a little cash from MY sales.
I can't BELIEVE your stuff is still for sale, Krosya.
You sold the one I really wanted!!!

Actually, most everything was sold, I just happen to have some extra lenses. Which one you "really" wanted?

 

[oldoc]

The 90, of course...

 

[ferider]

Michael: I would like to know how you feel the 28/2.8 compares with the camera your son is carrying .....

 

[oldoc]

I love the 28...
But I have to say, I did VERY RIGHT by my boy.
That 35/2.0 is unbelievable.
The camera is so smooth in operation, that, literally, a 10 year old can use it.
I have spent a good deal of time with him on his photography, and he hasn't read "Understanding Exposure", but he's doing very well!
An autofocus cron version 4?
Not fair!

 

[oldoc]

I know it isn't fair, and apples to oranges, but a scene from Zeiss 25/2.8..
Just doesn't have the UUUMPH!!!