Hexanon 35/2 original chrome model - user opinions

[dap]

Hi all,

I have been really tempted to buy the 35/2 hexanon UC lens that everybody raves about (I used to own a AF hexar and loved the photos the camera produced - hated the lack of manual focusing though). The only thing that is holding me back is the focusing tab - I'm not too partial to them. I noticed that konica did make a previous version of this lens w/ a regular focusing ring. Does anybody here own/use the older chrome version? Can you comment on the handling/picture quality (is it the same lens as the UC - just a different barrel?)? Looking at pictures on the web of this model it seems like it has the potential to be an ergonomic nightmare (small focus ring w/ the aperture ring crammed right next to it - seems like if a hood was used the aperture ring would be really hard to use). Any comments regarding first hand experience of the handling of this lens would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

 

[venchka]

I can't speak for the older lens. What I can say about the newer UC-Hexanon, from a handling stand point, can be said in one word: Perfect! I own two lenses with infinity stops/focusing handles which some folks hate. I don't mind them. I sometimes use them and mostly ignore them. The UC-Hexanon is my first and only tabbed lens. For a lens this size, really tiny, the tab is perfect. The placement of the aperture ring is perfect. The hood is always on.

By comparison, my much loved for their optical qualities 50mm/2.0 DR Summicron and 85mm/2.0 are way behind my Konica lenses in handling performance.

Personally, like those who disdain the M5, I can't figure out why someone wouldn't like a properly sized & well placed and totally useful tab. If I'm not mistaken, the tab is held on by 2 screws. I bet it comes off quickly. I'll check tonight.