Hide the cows...I think that guy has a leica!!!

R

rpsawin

Guest
And now for something completely ridiculous.......



Photographing cows or other farm scenery could land you in jail under Senate bill
Comments (99)
February 23, 2011
By: Bruce Ritchie
Taking photographs from the roadside of a sunrise over hay bales near the Suwannee River, horses grazing near Ocala or sunset over citrus groves along the Indian River could land you in jail under a Senate bill filed Monday.

SB 1246 by Sen. Jim Norman, R-Tampa, would make it a first-degree felony to photograph a farm without first obtaining written permission from the owner. A farm is defined as any land "cultivated for the purpose of agricultural production, the raising and breeding of domestic animals or the storage of a commodity."

Media law experts say the ban would violate freedoms protected in the U. S. Constitution. But Wilton Simpson, a farmer who lives in Norman's district, said the bill is needed to protect the property rights of farmers and the "intellectual property" involving farm operations.

Simpson, president of Simpson Farms near Dade City, said the law would prevent people from posing as farmworkers so that they can secretly film agricultural operations.

He said he could not name an instance in which that happened. But animal rights groups such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and Animal Freedom display undercover videos on their web sites to make their case that livestock farming and meat consumption are cruel.

Jeff Kerr, general counsel for PETA, said the state should be ashamed that such a bill would be introduced.

"Mr. Norman should be filing bills to throw the doors of animal producers wide open to show the public where their food comes from rather than criminalizing those who would show animal cruelty," he said.

Simpson agreed the bill would make it illegal to photograph a farm from a roadside without written permission. Norman could not be reached for comment.

Judy Dalglish, executive director for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said shooting property from a roadside or from the air is legal. The bill "is just flat-out unconstitutional not to mention stupid," she said.

And she said there are laws already to prosecute trespassing onto property without permission. And if someone poses as a farm employee to shoot undercover video, they can be fired and possibly sued.

"Why pass a law you know will not stand constitutional muster?" Dalglish said.

Simpson said he doesn't think that "innocent" roadside photography would be prosecuted even if the bill is passed as introduced.

"Farmers are a common-sense people," he said. "A tourist who stops and takes a picture of cows -- I would not imagine any farmer in the state of Florida that cares about that at all."

Originally published in the Florida Current - exclusively distributed via Lobbytools - Florida's Premiere Legislative and Media Monitoring Service.
 
I don't have any cows I have horses instead and if you come taking pictures at my farm I am liable to come out there and take pictures of you and your cameras! :)

What a bunch of nonsense! Politics is politics though I guess.

You might scare me if you come taking water/dirt samples or something however...
 
If these do gooders all get their way, there will be no photos to be taken outside of anything. Kinda sounds like some countries during the cold war when you were not allowed to have a camera. Next it will be guns, ammo & soon we will go to jail if we talk to someones wife. It is a sad day for America the land of the freedom of free, speech, religion & beliefs. We are slowly loosing what this country was founded on. I suggest we do not re elect these kind of lawmakers Democrats or Republicans that try and jamb these laws down our throats.
 
The day might come when we won't even be able to shoot through the window in our house as someone elses house might be in the picture!!
So, only way to make a photograph will be in our house with doors and windows closed, like a darkroom setup, hey we are back to basics. :eek:
 
"Mr. Norman should be filing bills to throw the doors of animal producers wide open to show the public where their food comes from rather than criminalizing those who would show animal cruelty," he said...

That's probably the reason for the bill. Very powerful commercial farming interests lurking behind this one. (Love a good conspiracy theory.)
 
...But Wilton Simpson, a farmer who lives in Norman's district, said the bill is needed to protect the property rights of farmers and the "intellectual property" involving farm operations.

oh great, now everything is an intellectual property.

They should ban street photography too as my method of walking is my intellectual property as well:rolleyes:
 
This has very little to do with photography and nothing to do with 'gooders' or photographers rights in the street and everything to do with the farm corps. not wanting people to see the processes that produce the meat they like to pay not much for.
 
My neighbor, where I sometimes work, has about 180 cows and around 100 sheep. He sells their meat in his own shop in front of the farm.
Last week he had three photographers visit him, one student, one pro doing a reportage and one family wanting to take pics with their children. He looks upon this as free publicity and PR and anybody who asks can visit the farm and stables, beware he will try to sell you his meat :D

To farming industry and their lobbyists "a curse on both your houses"

W
 
I have read that the bill was introduced, but has not passed.

There should be a Saturday Night Live routine for every idiot bill introduced like this.
 
Kully is right. It's a politician protecting his agribusiness donors (from bad publicity). The cow shooter with the Leica is just collateral damage.
 
This has very little to do with photography and nothing to do with 'gooders' or photographers rights in the street and everything to do with the farm corps. not wanting people to see the processes that produce the meat they like to pay not much for.

I support that opinion. To know more just get the film Food Inc but I think it has been largely ignored by the american public. The lack of knowledge about the processed food is indeed shared by the Europeans too.

I do however think that the cost is indeed higher for industrial farming due to the high external costs.
 
Last edited:
Industrial farming and ranching is not sustainable. Which doesn't bode well for the future of a country like the US with 308 million population. Hard to raise your own vegetables in a 4,000 unit housing complex. <political rant off>
 
Back
Top Bottom