Hmm... Graflex

Yes in deed William, it is! Up to $300 on a camera in this condition would be good.

(I have a 4x5 Speed Graphic which has a focal plane shutter in the body that allows me to use older lenses "in barrel" which means a lens without a shutter.)
 
Looks pretty clean but may be a tad expensive. I have seen them go cheaper, like 75.00- 150.00, althogh the lens on this one is pretty nice.
4x5 negs will blow your mind and the Graflex is a inexpensive way to get started in large format.

Todd
 
Even uncoated, the 127mm Ektar is an excellent lens. The Crown is one of the newer models but I haven't followed them enough to know what they usually bring.

Walker
 
Frank, it's graflex.org - and in the "Help" forum you'll find more info than you'll ever need 🙂

Denis
 
The Crown models don't have a focal plane shutter so they can only be used with shuttered lenses. I would say that this one is a little pricey for its condition.
 
Nothing wrong with 2x3... unless you can't find a 6x9 back for it first.

$200US does seem pricey for an old Graflex. Do you want a LF with a rangefinder or just an entry level 4x5 view/field camera?

Stu 🙂
 
I really don't know much about these. I do however occasionally look at 4x5 prices and this seems just a bit high for its stated condition. There are advantages to a press camera over a rail or even field camera for field use.

Other thoughts: I don't know how well the plastic bodies hold up use or price wise. I think the holders are getting harder to get. It should be lighter than a 4x5, but that 4x5 neg will be a greater joy. And, after all, neither of these is intended to be a 35mm RF replacement for anything other than film size.

You can get 2 1/4 by 3 3/4 or so film, but I think you will find yourself limited as to the film types available. Before you spring for that film size, you should check to see what is available, and be sure that will satisfy your photographic desires.
 
wlewisiii said:
Makes sense.

What about this one?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=30099&item=3865349838&rd=1

William
Click to expand...

I like the small format Graflex for roll film use. But that's roll film only. If you want to do sheet, get a 4x5.
This guys pictures are crummy. It looks like he has one roll film back. The sheet film backs are pretty much worthless unless you're gonna cut your own film. Forget about the poloroid back. So, essentially, you'd be buying one camera without a rangefinder and one roll film back. It's up to you.

Why is it that people selling camera on ebay take the worst pictures of the cameras they're selling?
 
I was thinking mostly of roll film at this time - I can develope that but not sheet film at this point. From that perspective, the 2x3 with graflok back built in seemed like it might be a reasonable option.

The other thing is that this is more simple curiosity at this point - I really have a few other items with a higher priority; not the least of which is scrounging the money for an R2C... 😀

Thanks all for your advice, I appreciate it.

William
 
I have a 3 1/4 X 4 1/4 Speed Graphic as well as the 2 1/4X 3 1/4.

I recommend the 3X4 model only if you are collecting. Precut film is hard to find in 3X4, and for less trouble you can shoot the larger 4X5. 4X5 also can step-down to 2X3 with an adapter while 2X3 is not practical to try and step-up. If you are going to be enlarging, you will probably end up with a 4X5 enlarger anyway.

The FP shutter on the Speed Graphics is non-self-capping. It is basically a long, long piece of rubberized fabric with different speed/slits cut into it. You have to close the shutter between windings or make sure dark slide is inserted. Lots of things to remember to do.

I personally have more fun with the 2X3 Speed Graphic and Busch Pressman, but that's just a handling preference.

Back in the 60's I worked in a hospital medical illustration lab as a volunteer. We only shot black and white in 4X5 size. Any quality drop (based on visible grain) below that was considered unacceptable.
 
wlewisiii said:
I was thinking mostly of roll film at this time - I can develope that but not sheet film at this point. From that perspective, the 2x3 with graflok back built in seemed like it might be a reasonable option.

The other thing is that this is more simple curiosity at this point - I really have a few other items with a higher priority; not the least of which is scrounging the money for an R2C... 😀

Thanks all for your advice, I appreciate it.

William
Click to expand...

Calumet sells nice roll film adapters for the 4x5 to use 120/220. I got two off eb*y for around $60.00. Right after I mentioned that in this forum, I noticed a price spike to more than twice that.

Note to self: Be careful what you say on a forum where you don't know who is lurking. :bang: Should have known. Look what happened to Canonete cameras. 😀
 
Just did quick search on 2x3 sheet film.
So far I've only found five types-
Ilford FP4+, HP5+ and Wephoto 25, 100 and 400.

On the flipside, heaps of 5x7 still being made.

Stu 🙂
 
JandC has Efke and their own house brand in 2X3. They have a lot of metric sizes too.

http://www.jandcphotography.com/

Their film is European in origin, so you probably can get it cheaper from other sources than the US.

I learned sheet film developing in trays with bare hands, one sheet at a time, until I developed a skin allergy. After that I went to gloves. If you are not in a hurry and donl' shoot an entire box at one time, it works.

-Paul
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Epson RD-1 support in DxO Photolab [tutorial]
Replies
0
Views
655
prmortimer
P
S
A short Post-Christmas giveaway thread
2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
seany65
S
J
  • Article Article
Camera Repair Horrors: These are the models that give repairmen agita.
2 3 4
Replies
79
Views
8K
Ljós
L
J
35mm Still-Picture Photography: It began with scale focusing cameras! Back To Basics. Part 1, From the first to half-frame 35s of then and now.
Replies
10
Views
1K
Jason Schneider
J
J
  • Article Article
What exactly is a point & shoot camera? Glad you asked!The Kodak of 1888 may have been the first, and even Leica got into the act!
Replies
17
Views
1K
Mos6502
Mos6502
Back
Top Bottom