Timmyjoe
Veteran
Way more work than its worth to keep using an ancient camera. I'd think you'd have a lot of dust on the film and maybe fingerprints and scratches from all that handling.
Hey Chris,
While there certainly is a case to be made for your statement, if handled carefully in a clean environment (I keep the inside of my changing tent very clean) you can do a pretty nice job cutting down 120 film for a 127 camera, with a minimum of fingerprints, scratches or dust.
And who is to say if something is or isn't worth the time, for someone else to do. I get great joy out of using my old Baby Grey Rollei, and my mom's old Kodak Reflex Synchro, and I can't use either without 127 film. Would I use either for a critical project or for a paying client, probably not.
I also get great enjoyment from my 1947 Kodak Medalist II and its sheet film back (practical, not really), and my 1936 Kodak Duo 620 which requires re-rolling 120 film onto 620 spools.
I find the process of making images on photographic film quite enjoyable. And the more I am involved in the process from beginning to end, the more fun I have.
The way I figure it, if you enjoy the process, have at it.
Best,
-Tim