How Canon Reinvented Itself for Mirrorless and Now Leads the Market!

How Canon Reinvented Itself for Mirrorless:
After a slow start Canon is now dominating the mirrorless market

By Jason Schneider

First mirrorless? Trendsetting Panasonic Lumix G1 MFT-format shown with G Vario 14-45mm zoom ...jpeg
The Panasonic Lumix G1 of 2008, a Micro Four Thirds-format interchangeable lens camera, was the first of the breed dubbed "mirrorless."

It seems amazing, but mirrorless cameras were not really a thing until that term was coined to describe the Panasonic Lumix G1, a Micro Four Thirds interchangeable lens camera that was introduced in 2008. Despite the sketchiness of naming this emerging category of compact, interchangeable lens cameras after a feature they do not possess, the term “mirrorless” stuck, and others like “MILC” (for mirrorless interchangeable lens camera) and “CSC” (for compact system camera) have fallen by the wayside. The initial crop of mirrorless cameras was dismissed by serious photographers because their relatively low-res LCDs and electronic viewfinders (EVFs) had sluggish refresh rates and provided a substandard viewing and monitoring experience that couldn’t compare to a DSLR’s optical viewfinder and higher-res LCD. They were also pokey in terms of their AF performance and their batteries usually had to be recharged more frequently. However mirrorless cameras have inherent advantages in being able to focus, meter, and perform other functions before, during, and after the exposure, can achieve more compact form factors with shorter flange focal distances that provide much greater optical flexibility in designing compact, high performance lenses that deliver enhanced performance, and enable faster burst rates, superior video parameters, and enhanced (boosted) viewing in low light. Once the refresh rates, resolution, and color accuracy of their EVFs and LCDs were brought up to speed through steady advances in technology, mirrorless cameras simply had greater upside potential for future development and that’s why they’ve effectively surpassed all but a few remaining flagship DLRs and now dominate the market.

Canon EOS M.jpeg
The EOS M of 2012 was Canon's first mirrorless camera. Perky and cute this APS-C-format compact had an EF-M mount that's still in use.

Canon’s first mirrorless camera, the Canon EOS M of 2012, was an attractive 18MP APS-C format compact with an EF-M mount, an electronic shutter, and a DIGIG-5 processor—essentially a mirrorless iteration of the Canon EOS 650D—but it was not a game-changer. It was, in turn superseded by the Canon EOS M2 (2013), the EOS M10 (2015) the EOS M100 (2017), and the EOS M200 (2019) and the still current 24.1 MP, APS-C-format Canon EOS M50 Mark II with a DIGIC 8 image processor and capable of shooting 4K video at 23.98 fps. However, Canon didn’t start becoming a serious contender in the serious enthusiast, upscale sector of the mirrorless market until it launched the full frame Canon EOS R with a new full frame RF mount in 2018, and only really took off with the release of the Canon EOS R5 and R6 (2020) and pro-caliber R3 (2021), the subsequent APS-C format EOS R10 and R7 (2022), and finally the full frame Canon EOS 6 Mark II in late 2022.

Current Canon EOS M50 Mark II with EF-M 15-45mm (24-72mm equivalent) zoom lens .jpg

Canon EOS M50 Mark II: Current 24.1 MP, APS-C-format M-series EOS has a DIGIC 8 image processor, can shoot 4K video at 23.98 fps!

It's noteworthy that one of the defining moments in the emergence of the mirrorless camera market came with Sony’s introduction of the first professional full frame mirrorless camera, the Sony a7, back in 2013, which incorporated fast phase-detect AF. In that same year, mirrorless cameras accounted for roughly 5% of total camera shipments, but by 2015 that had risen to 26% outside the U.S, and 16% within the U.S. In 2018 Sony announced the a9 with 693 AF points and a maximum 20fps burst rate, unleashed the 42MP Sony a7RIII with a 10-fps maximum full-res burst rate, and Nikon brought forth its new mirrorless full frame Z-mount cameras, the Nikon Z6 and Z7.

Sony a7 with FE 28-70mm  f:3.5-5.6 OSS zoom lens.jpg
Sony a7 of 2013, the first pro-level full frame mirrorless camera, redefined the category with features like fast phase-detection AF, and more.

At this point Canon was clearly playing catch-up with the EOS R, despite its wide 54mm diameter RF mount with a 20mm flange focal distance and an advanced IBIS hybrid AF system. However, according to one detailed comparison test published at the time, the EOS R still managed to upstage its archrival, the Nikon Z7, offering the following advantages: 5162 more focus points (5655 vs 493), 40 shots longer battery life (370 shots vs 330 shots), phase detection AF for shooting videos, a built-in HDR mode for enhanced video adjustment capability in post-production, a 336Mps higher movie recording bitrate (480Mbps vs 144Mbps), and a 1.56x higher maximum ISO (ISO 40000 vs ISO 25600).

Canon, Sony, and Nikon go head-to-head in the mirrorless aren

What’s even more important than the outcome of any individual head-to-head victory is that Canon hung in there, steadily improving the feature set and ergonomics of each consecutive model in the R-series mirrorless line, sequentially rolling a diversified line of very competitive Canon R mirrorless cameras at every price point, from broad spectrum entry level to full-on professional. A stellar example is the popular current pro-aimed Canon EOS R5 that features a new 45MP full-frame CMOS mated to an advanced DIGIX X image processor, and an AF system that can lock onto and capture fast-moving subjects with impressive accuracy and speed. When using the mechanical shutter, it can shoot at up to 12 fps, and up to 20 fps using the nearly silent electronic shutter. Like its stable mate the EOS R6, it employs Canon’s advanced Dual Pixel CMOS AF II that provides nearly 100% coverage of the AF area and has a built-in EOS iTR AF X system that uses AF-tracking algorithms and Deep Learning to continually optimize and enhance the readout speed of the sensor and the processing speed. Its 1,053-automatically-selected AF zones can detect a human eye, face, or head, as well as the eyes, faces and bodies of animals and instantly adjust the focus. Other key features: a 5-axis in-body image stabilizer that works with the optical image stabilizer in IS-equipped RF lenses to provide up to 8 stops of anti-shake, a native ISO 100–51,200 range that’s expandable to ISO 102,400, internal video recording at 8K RAW at up to 29.9 fps, 8K internal video at up to 29.97 fps in 4:2:2 10-bit Canon Log (H.265)/4:2:2/10-bit HDR PQ (H.265), and 4K internal video recording at up to 119.88 fps in 4:2:2 10-bit Canon Log (H.265)/4:2:2 10-bit HDR PQ (H.265). Its 0.5-inch, 5.76M-dot EVF has a 119.88-fps refresh rate, it sports a 3.2-inch, 2.1M-dot Vari-angle touchscreen LCD, and offers separate slots for CFexpress and SD UHS-II cards, built-in 5GHz/2.4GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, the ability to voice-tag photos and videos. It’s all built into a rugged weatherproof body. Street price: $3,599.00 body only.

Canon EOS R5 with 24-105mm f:4 L IS USM zoom lens.jpg
Canon EOS R5 features a 45MP full-frame CMOS sensor, an advanced DIGIX X image processor, and a fast, decisive pro-level AF system.

Canon EODS R3 with 24-70mm f:2.8 Canon L IS USM zoom.jpg
Top-of-the-line Canon EOS R3 provides performance parameters and construction that equal or surpass the flagship EOS-1D X Mark III SLR.

The current top-of-the line Canon EOS R professional mirrorless camera is the Canon EOS R3, which employs a 24.1MP Full-Frame Stacked BSI CMOS sensor coupled with Canon’s state-of-the-art DIGIC X image processor to deliver the full complement of technology from the mirrorless EOS R system along with the robustness and performance parameters of its acclaimed flagship DSLR. The stacked sensor provides ultra-fast readout speeds to minimize the effects of rolling shutter distortion, benefitting video recording and shooting high-speed bursts. This advanced sensor/processor combo enables such impressive performance parameters as sensitivity settings from ISO 100-102400 (expandable to ISO 50-204800), continuous burst rates of up to 30 fps at 24.1 MP for up to 150 frames (Raw)/540 frames (JPEG) with the electronic shutter and up to 12 fps at 24.1 MP for up to 1,000 frames (Raw)/ 100 frames (JPEG) with the mechanical shutter. Video recording specs are equally outstanding; it can capture H.265/MP4 4:2:2 10-bit internal video in DCI 4K at 23.98, 24.00,29.97,50, 59.94, and 100 fps, external 4:2:2 10-Bit video via HDMI in DCI 4K at 23.98, 24.00, 25, 29.97, 50, and 59.94 fps, and UHD 4K at 23.98, 25, 29.97, 50 and 59.94 fps. 6K Raw video with Dual Pixel AF II and HDR-PQ recording are also possible. Other EOS R3 features include: Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with 1053 points covering the entire sensor area auth AF down to -7.5 EV, Eye Control AF useable with focus tracking, 5-axis sensor shift In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) that provides an impressive 8-stop anti-shake-effect advantage, a 5.7 M-Dot OLED EVF with 0.76x magnification and a 120 fps refresh rate, a 3.2-inch vari-angle, 4.25m-Dot touchscreen LCD, an electronic shutter with speeds to 1/64,000 sec and flash sync up to 1/180 sec, 5GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity plus a built-in GPS module, and dual memory card slots for CFexpress Type B, and SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II) cards respectively. All this and a lot more are built into a robust, ergonomic, magnesium alloy body with an integrated vertical grip that’s built to the same weather-sealed standards as the flagship EOS-1D X Mark III. Street price: $5,799.00, body only.

Canon’s worthy Sony and Nikon competitors: The battle continues!

Sony Alpha 1: It’s not only the flagship of the Alpha line of full frame mirrorless cameras but also the most technologically advanced Sony ever. The Alpha 1 employs Sony’s latest high efficiency stacked 50.1MP Exmor RS BSI CMOS sensor coupled to its most advanced state-of-the-art BIONZ XR processing engine. This combo delivers such impressive performance parameters as a continuous full-res framing rate of 30 fps with AF and AE, 8K30p and 4K120p 10-bit video recording with internal 4:2:2 10-bit sampling, and 16-bit raw output via the full-size HDMI, and an extended sensitivity range of ISO 50-102400 with a 15-stop dynamic range. The sensor also incorporates a 759-point Fast Hybrid AF system with 425 contrast-detect points and noticeably upgraded focus tracking, Real-time Eye AF on people and animals, and a dedicated Bird Mode. Other key features: a hi-res 9.44m-dot OLED EVF with a 240-fps refresh rate, a 3.0-inch 1.44m-dot tilting touchscreen, an upgraded electronic shutter that provides flash sync at up to 1/200 sec, and up to 1/400 sec when used with the upgraded mechanical shutter. In addition, its enhanced 5.5-stop effective 5-axis SteadyShot INSIDE image stabilization can correct for pitch and yaw, it has built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC connectivity, an ISB 3.2 Gen 1, micro-USB, and Ethernet ports, and dual memory card slots that both accept CFexpress or SD UHS-II cards. As you’d expect, the Alph1 offers an extensive range of customizable color and gamma controls including S-Log2 and S-log3 Gamma and provides XAVC and XAVC S-1 codecs to suit different workflows. Its body features comprehensive weather sealing and is built on a robust magnesium alloy chassis. Street price: $6,498.00, body only.

Sony Alpha 1 with grip and 55mm f:1.8 Zeiss Sonnar FE ZA lens.jpg
Sony Alpha 1: Sony's flagship pro model is a formidable competitor with a full-res burst rate of 30 fps and can capture 8K 30p video!Nikon Z9. with Z 24-70 f:2.8 S Nikkor lens.png
Nikon's top-of-the-line pro Z9 features an FX-format 45.7MP BSI stacked CMOS sensor coupled to an advanced EXPEED 7 image processor.

Nikon Z9: The heart of Nikon’s rugged new top-of-the-line mirrorless crossover Z is an FX-format 45.7MP BSI stacked CMOS sensor integrated with Nikon’s latest most advanced EXPEED 7 image processor. This state-of-the-art combo is claimed to reduce rolling shutter effects, deliver AF speeds 10x faster, enable sensitivity settings from ISO 64-25600 (expandable to ISO 32-102400), and provide continuous shooting speeds of 20 fps (RAW), 30 fps (JPEG), and up to 120 fps (!) when recording 11MP stills from video, all while supporting full AF and AE. The Z9 is also able to buffer over 1,000 RAW images in a single burst (equal to 50 sec of continuous recording), has a nearly silent electronic shutter with a top speed of 1/32,000 for working in bright light (no mechanical shutter is required!), and can capture 8K video at 30 fps, 4K video at up to 120 fps and oversampled 4K video at 30 fps for increased sharpness and detail. Other features: high speed 493-point phase-detection AF enabling AF at 120 fps and providing Starlight mode for focusing down to -8.5 EV(!), Subject Detection with Deep Learning Technology, Auto-Area AF, Eye-Detection AF, Dynamic-Area AF, and 3D Tracking, internal recording with 10-bit color and 4:2:2 sampling in a variety of codecs, a 10-bit N-Log setting, and HLG (Hybrid Log Gamma) for creating HDR content in camera. The camera incorporates a Real-Live 3.69m-dot OLED EVF with adjustable luminance, a Four-Axis 3.2-inch, 2.1m-dot tilting touch-screen LCD, Dual CFexpress Type B memory card slots that are compatible with XQD cards, built-in Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity (2.4 and 5 GHz), and in-body Vibration Reduction (VR) with Synchro VR (with select lenses) providing up to 6 stops of compensation to minimize the effects of camera shake. It’s all built into a rugged, weather resistant body with a magnesium alloy chassis that’s 20% smaller than the flagship Nikon D6 SLR. Street price: $5,496.95, body only.

Selected stats on the Mirrorless Marketplace

According to a Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence bulletin, the global mirrorless market is expected to grow at an annual rate of 3.67% over the forecast period, reaching a market size of $2.54 billion in 2026, up from an actual level of $1.97 billion in 2019, due to a rise in disposable income, changing consumer lifestyles, increasing urbanization, etc. It's also significant that Canon, Nikon, and Sony (among others) have invested considerable capital to enhance their mirrorless portfolios, one notable example being Canon’s EOS R3 introduced to compete directly with Nikon’s impressive high-end, pro-aimed Z9.

According to CIPA (Camera & Imaging Products Association) data mirrorless cameras are now the “beating financial heart” of the imaging industry, accounting for 38% of the units shipped but 67% of their value. And based on the latest figures Canon has nearly half the camera market share (46.5%), or nearly double the share of Sony (26.1%), with Nikon at a distant third place (11.7%). Note: This report does not make any distinction between mirrorless cameras and other types, such as DSLRs. Nevertheless, Canon’s mirrorless market share is still higher than Sony’s at 1.54 million units compared to 1.25 million units, but Sony is ahead in terms of the value of mirrorless cameras sold at 565 billion yen vs. Canon’s 506.7 billion yen. This difference is attributable to the fact that Sony concentrates on higher-end mirrorless models aimed at pros whereas Canon’s mirrorless cameras serve a more diversified, broad-spectrum demographic that includes pros, enthusiasts, and casual shooters. In short, Canon excels when it comes to selling more affordable mirrorless cameras. In terms of market share the current breakdown hasn’t changed much compared to previous years, with Canon increasing its lead by 0.7%, Sony falling by only 0.9%, and Nikon rising by 0.4%. One bright spot for Sony: CIPA stats for 2022 show Sony edging out Canon in mirrorless camera sales in Japan, at 32% and 28% of the market respectively.

The bottom line

Perhaps the best summation of Canon’s success in the mirrorless came in an interview we conducted with the astute manager of a large midwestern photo specialty dealer that wishes to remain anonymous.

“Canon has a mirrorless camera for everybody, and they cover the price points better than anyone. In general Canon mirrorless cameras have superior ergonomics and more intuitive controls than Sony’s which are technological marvels but not as handy or convenient, and even Nikon’s, which perform extremely well and feel great in the hand but use too many buttons to access various features. Canon got serious with the Canon EOS R in 2018, and steadily improved it in terms of features, specs, and a more intuitive user interface, and that’s why they’re in the lead at the present time. But make no mistake, this is a fiercely competitive sector of the market and great companies such Nikon and Sony are not about to sit idly by and let Canon eat their lunch. As someone once said. ‘Competition is the right arm of America’ and mirrorless camera fans are going to have some phenomenal new options going forward.”
 
Last edited:
It's nice to see eye-control AF is back. I was surprised how well it worked on the Elan 7NE - though not for everyone.
The concept of eye-control AF is certainly valid, but the execution has often been less than optimal. I'm not sure how well the latest iteration works, but if it's noticeably better than it was in the Canon Elan you cited, it's probably a worthwhile feature.
 
I've heard it said ever since the SLR boom of the 1980s that Canon outdid everybody else in "dealer support": friendly pricing to high-volume dealers, generous co-op ad money (money offered by a manufacturer for advertising its brand), store signage and fixture allowances, etc... not to mention NOT offering all those things to dealers who did NOT prioritize Canon. And while I wouldn't dream of mentioning the word "sp*ff", it wouldn't surprise me if individual salespeople also benefitted somehow from Canon's comprehensive approach to marketing.

And I would also not be surprised if this form of leadership continued today. But I would NOT expect "the astute manager of a large midwestern photo specialty dealer" to acknowledge that, even anonymously!
 
And yet, I know no one who uses Canon.

Let's see how successful Voigtlander is at wedging open a closed mount.

In all my years at RFF I would have to say Canon gear in general has never really been prominent here. I have owned one in my life ... an AE-1 Program and it was a great camera! :)
 
Canon is so Toyota with it's soap bodies.

I have dump load of DSLRs, two SLRs and two digital P&S.

I got rid of their FF mirrorless because it crapped out due to faulty power switch design and their service asking 400 USD to replace it. It was slush camera and native lenses were cheap by design and outdated, stumbled on AF.

The reason why some sources are saying it is numéro Uno is because many paid photogs, business are still using Canon.

For non money making Canon R and RF series are just boring meh.
 
I'm still using the analog EOS 5 and the digital 5DMII. Both are very good cameras. I haven't used the 1DMIII in a long time. Many moons ago, this camera was diagnosed with a problem and Canon Canada fixed it within days without charge. I've kept my Canon EF L glass: the 2.8/16-35; the 2.8/24-70, the 1.2/85, the 2.8/70-200, and the 2.8/70-200 are all fantastic lenses. Canon -and Nikon, were of course very late in the mirrorless game and I jumped ship. Cheers, OtL
 
Good to see my Lumix G1 as the first "mirrorless".

Off-topic but I had a Canon Compact long ago which had the first fully-articulating LCD I had seen ... one of my reasons for buying the G1.
 
I used Canon for a long time, starting with an AE-1 Program I bought at the PX in Germany while stationed there in 1983. Many other since. Dearly loved the T90 & the A2E. That said, once I bought a Nikon F2 in the early 201x's, I haven't even looked at any Canon newer than a Canon 7 LTM. They just work better for me and the results look better.

It would be a terrible thing to lose either of them though, as the camera world would be a much poorer place without them. Only Sony and Fuji? How boring a world that would be...
 
After a few years hiatus from photography in the 90s, I returned by buying up Canon EOS gear and I used it up until a few years ago. That's when I got back into using Nikons. While I have a long history and I love using Nikons, I cannot say anything bad about Canon gear other than their EF consumer lenses were never legendary. Ergonomically, Canon was superb and their cameras were sturdy and reliable. The L-series lenses 17-40/4, 70-200/2.8 and 400/5.6 I had were truly excellent. I still miss the incredible 400mm even though I hardly ever need a lens that long these days. It was great for bird-in-flight photos. Also for backyard birding with a 1.4X extender attached. Great lens. Today I have a Tamron 100-400 that I hardly ever use at all.
 
I've heard it said ever since the SLR boom of the 1980s that Canon outdid everybody else in "dealer support": friendly pricing to high-volume dealers, generous co-op ad money (money offered by a manufacturer for advertising its brand), store signage and fixture allowances, etc... not to mention NOT offering all those things to dealers who did NOT prioritize Canon. And while I wouldn't dream of mentioning the word "sp*ff", it wouldn't surprise me if individual salespeople also benefitted somehow from Canon's comprehensive approach to marketing.

And I would also not be surprised if this form of leadership continued today. But I would NOT expect "the astute manager of a large midwestern photo specialty dealer" to acknowledge that, even anonymously!
Back in the day when I was the manager of a camera concession in a department store on Long Island, Pentax (then distributed by Honeywell) sent a shill to our store who posed as a professional photographer who was just getting into 35mm. I recommended the Nikon F, but did not make the sale. A few days later I was called on the carpet by my boss who chewed me out for not recommending the Pentax—it seems that once the shill filed his report Honeywell threatened to yank our franchise! Spiffs were pretty common in those days and when I was working my way through college as a counter salesman at Willoughby’s my boss (an ex-marine) raked me over the coals, spewing a lot of F-bombs, for selling a Kodak Carousel projector to a midwestern tourist instead of the piece of crap Miranda Auto Sensor branded projector that carried a $10 spiff. In short, while there has always been a background level of skulduggery in the retail trade, I don’t think it’s fair or accurate to suggest that Canon’s success in the Mirrorless sector is attributable to coercive marketing tactics.
 
Canon to me has always seemed to be the first to innovate, to take risks, whereas Nikon has been conservative and seems to enjoy linking its future with its past.

In the early 1980's, the Canon New F-1 ("F-1N") I think had more ruggedness and higher build quality than the Nikon F2 and more features and flexibility than the F3. Nikon would introduce new features in its consumer line (such as the FA) before those features eventually migrated to their pro cameras.

In contrast, whereas Nikon retained high compatibilty in its lens mount with future Nikons, Canon took the bold step of ditching the FD mount for EOS - not only adopting autofocus, but eliminating the aperture ring and also having both shutter speed and aperture set by thumbwheels on the camera body. A pro switching from an F3 wouldn't feel that the F4 was too unusual; a pro switching from an F-1N to an EOS-1N likely experienced some sort of shock.

Even through the digital era, Canon has seemed to be quicker than Nikon to innovate and introduce new or different things. Yet Canon would be unlikely to introduce a retro-style digital Fd (my April Fool's joke) like Nikon has with the Df, ZFc, and ZF. I'm not saying one approach is better than the other - they are just different.
 
Dear Board,

Mirrorless cameras are only 15 years old. How much of Canon's success, and Nikon's as well, is due to familiarity? For hobbyists it might not mean as much, but for professionals I have no doubt that familiarity plays a huge role in the brand they choose. Fuji and Sony are players in the mirrorless market. Fuji while a long-established camera and lens maker, had no real following among professional camera users unless we are talking medium format. Sony invented the Walk-Man and the Betamax, they were a consumer electronics company making widgets, first and foremost.

People who are dedicated to a brand and who rely on that brand to generate their income are remarkably brand loyal, even today. I've no doubt that Canon's rise is due to dedicated loyal customers. Likewise for Nikon.

Me, I'm happy with Olympus, and their "old" cameras produced before the sell-off.

Regards,

Tim Murphy

Harrisburg PA :)
 
Canon to me has always seemed to be the first to innovate, to take risks, whereas Nikon has been conservative and seems to enjoy linking its future with its past.

In the early 1980's, the Canon New F-1 ("F-1N") I think had more ruggedness and higher build quality than the Nikon F2 and more features and flexibility than the F3. Nikon would introduce new features in its consumer line (such as the FA) before those features eventually migrated to their pro cameras.

In contrast, whereas Nikon retained high compatibilty in its lens mount with future Nikons, Canon took the bold step of ditching the FD mount for EOS - not only adopting autofocus, but eliminating the aperture ring and also having both shutter speed and aperture set by thumbwheels on the camera body. A pro switching from an F3 wouldn't feel that the F4 was too unusual; a pro switching from an F-1N to an EOS-1N likely experienced some sort of shock.

Even through the digital era, Canon has seemed to be quicker than Nikon to innovate and introduce new or different things. Yet Canon would be unlikely to introduce a retro-style digital Fd (my April Fool's joke) like Nikon has with the Df, ZFc, and ZF. I'm not saying one approach is better than the other - they are just different.
I find this interesting, as someone who is well-invested in Canon dSLRs and both EF and EF-S lenses.

You're right that, historically, Canon seems to have thought "you have to be prepared to eat your own children" in pursuing new technology, while Nikon has tried to preserve continuity for their old customer-base into their newer technologies. (Either approach, IMO, is better than the "just give up" method used by Olympus when autofocus SLRs came along).

I bought into Canon because the 300D (aka 'Digital Rebel') was the 1st dSLR I could actually afford (it was a lower-end version of equivalent Nikon and Canon dSLRs which I could not then afford). I had no pre-existing commitment - all my film SLR gear was MF Olympus/Zuiko.

I've since acquired a fair collection of Canon lenses (including some excellent L-grade lenses) and have been generally happy with my Canon dSLRs (300D, 30D, 50D, 5D(i), 7Dii, 5Div). I specifically bought the last (5Div) because it likely is the last one I'll be able to buy. I thought I should "get it while the getting is good" - because I'm far from sure I want to go down the 'mirrorless' path and, even if I decide to, whether I'll want to go down Canon's mirrorless path. This is the down-side of the "eat your own children" approach - if I'm going to have to change systems, who says I have to go with your new system? Maybe your competitors are better. I'm at least going to look!

A lot of this, though, for me (YMMV) is that I'm far from sure I want to play the 'mirrorless' game. Part of this (I guess) is eyesight-related, but mostly it's because I'm something of an "optical finder bigot". I'm yet to find an EVF I like. Every tech generation or so, someone tells me: "this one is different and so much better". Each time I check, my reaction is: "yeah, ... nah!"

To some extent I am in the 'mirrorless' game - I have a Leica M typ 240 which can play the game (but I use the optical RF finder). As can my X-Pro1 (where I also use the optical finder). The same, even, with my old Canon G1 X (where I do sometimes use the flip-out screen as a waist-level finder but mostly use, yes, the optical finder despite how dreadful it is). The only cameras where I regularly use an electronic finder are my iPhone and a Canon SX 620HS (which I have purely for its long-range optical zoom and the fact that it fits easily in my bum-bag when riding my bicycle).

It seems we're all 'being pushed' by camera companies to go to 'mirrorless' - and maybe I will, eventually, because of that push. But I doubt it. I think I'll stick with optical finders: old cameras like my 5Div, which is good enough for me, and Leica Ms (presuming they'll still make them, which I think they will). Maybe even Fujifilm X-Pro cameras if they still continue to make them (though I've not liked them enough to even upgrade from my X-Pro1 and I'm not sure they're 'upgrading' them in a direction I like).

...Mike
 
I had hoped my eyesight would change after cataract surgery and I would be able to use the EVFs in my X-Pro cameras. Didn't happen. I simply have come to the conclusion that I utterly, completely and will eternally despise and detest EVFs. When everyone but Pentax decided to kill off their DSLRs and only produce those EVF video camera wannabe things, I revolted. I went the other way and added a pile of old Nikkor manual focus lenses to my gear pile. That's the one area where Nikon stands above Canon. Apparently (but I'm not sure) the old Canon manual focus lenses cannot be adapted to the EF mount whereas the Nikkor F-mount lenses can be utilized on recent Nikon DSLR bodies and adapted to those gawdawful EVF things. That is as long as they were modified to auto indexing (AI).

I suppose at some time in the future an innovative imaging company will come up with a new system using optical viewfinders again and the entire photographic world will be impressed with the new technology.
 
Apparently (but I'm not sure) the old Canon manual focus lenses cannot be adapted to the EF mount whereas the Nikkor F-mount lenses can be utilized on recent Nikon DSLR bodies and adapted to those gawdawful EVF things. That is as long as they were modified to auto indexing (AI).
As I understand it, old Canon FD mount MF lenses could be adapted to the new EOS cameras, but only with an optical converter to allow proper focus (and, from memory, only worked with some lenses).

Nikon, meanwhile, retained (and still retains) substantial compatibility across a great many of its lenses.

…Mike
 
As I understand it, old Canon FD mount MF lenses could be adapted to the new EOS cameras, but only with an optical converter to allow proper focus (and, from memory, only worked with some lenses)......
The flange-back distance for Canon FD cameras/lenses is 42mm, for EOS cameras/lenses it's 44mm. A guy named Ed Mika offered adaptors, without any optics, that would allow you to mount a FD lens on a EOS body. The original mounts were brass, later were a composite. I bought the do-it-yourself kit for my FD 28/2.0. Not terribly hard to install, and it worked well. Sadly, Ed passed away a few years back, but his convertors are still around.

Jim B.
 
Canon to me has always seemed to be the first to innovate, to take risks, whereas Nikon has been conservative and seems to enjoy linking its future with its past.

In the early 1980's, the Canon New F-1 ("F-1N") I think had more ruggedness and higher build quality than the Nikon F2 and more features and flexibility than the F3. Nikon would introduce new features in its consumer line (such as the FA) before those features eventually migrated to their pro cameras.

In contrast, whereas Nikon retained high compatibilty in its lens mount with future Nikons, Canon took the bold step of ditching the FD mount for EOS - not only adopting autofocus, but eliminating the aperture ring and also having both shutter speed and aperture set by thumbwheels on the camera body. A pro switching from an F3 wouldn't feel that the F4 was too unusual; a pro switching from an F-1N to an EOS-1N likely experienced some sort of shock.

Even through the digital era, Canon has seemed to be quicker than Nikon to innovate and introduce new or different things. Yet Canon would be unlikely to introduce a retro-style digital Fd (my April Fool's joke) like Nikon has with the Df, ZFc, and ZF. I'm not saying one approach is better than the other - they are just different.
I Mostly agree with you except I wouldn't say that the Canton New F-1 (F-1N) "had more ruggedness and higher build quality than the Nikon F2." I own both and they're among the best SLRs made by their respective manufacturers.
 
Back in the day when I was the manager of a camera concession in a department store on Long Island, Pentax (then distributed by Honeywell) sent a shill to our store who posed as a professional photographer who was just getting into 35mm. I recommended the Nikon F, but did not make the sale. A few days later I was called on the carpet by my boss who chewed me out for not recommending the Pentax—it seems that once the shill filed his report Honeywell threatened to yank our franchise! Spiffs were pretty common in those days and when I was working my way through college as a counter salesman at Willoughby’s my boss (an ex-marine) raked me over the coals, spewing a lot of F-bombs, for selling a Kodak Carousel projector to a midwestern tourist instead of the piece of crap Miranda Auto Sensor branded projector that carried a $10 spiff. In short, while there has always been a background level of skulduggery in the retail trade, I don’t think it’s fair or accurate to suggest that Canon’s success in the Mirrorless sector is attributable to coercive marketing tactics.
That's why I didn't mention the word "sp*ff"... 🤐
 
Back
Top Bottom