crawdiddy
qu'est-ce que c'est?
jlw said:They tested this on Mythbusters and found, somewhat to their own surprise, that they got less wet by walking. One theory was that running splashed up more standing water from the ground.
Don't know what theoretical physics says, but that's an experimental result.
I always figured that if the rain was falling continuously at a steady rate, the path you have to take as you walk or run forms a three-dimensional corridor in which raindrops are going to be distributed randomly. That means you'll encounter the same number of raindrops regardless of how fast you traverse the corridor. If you run, you might get more of the drops hitting you in the front, and if you walk, you might get more of the drops hitting you on top, but you'll pass through the same number of raindrops regardless as long as you don't stop moving.
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense. Ignoring for now the possibility of splashing water due to running through puddles, the less time you spend between point A and point B, the less wet you will be. Therefore, walking will get you more wet than running.
What if you walked at a super-slow pace, let's say one one-thousandth your normal walking pace? It's obvious you would have spent 1000 times longer out in the rain, and therefore would be wetter.