Sorry, I can't quite see your point. Pictures are a part of telling them what you did, and what the place was like.
In fact, I'd suggest that unless you are a very good raconteur, they are likely to be more interested in what the place is like, rather than in what you did.
i can speak to the photo/narration issue from a long-time newspaper editor's experience.
if a photo (or photo layout) stands by itself, its caption(s) - or an accompanying copy block - should provide some narration; one should not let a reader guess the context of the photo(s).
if a photo(s), accompanies an article, the caption only need make a connection with the article. narrative can be found in the article itself.
I think that it's important sometimes for context - a good photo can be enhanced, but it's terrific when it can be folded into the photo, as Helen Hill does here: http://rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1462489&postcount=69
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.