HU: Kobalux 21/2.8 LTM Lens at Fedka

W

wlewisiii

Guest
For those who might be interested, while looking for somthing else, I noticed that Yuri has a listing for this lens. I've never used it but have read good things about it (Cameraquest, I think). Not something I'll be able to afford anytime soon :bang: but someone here may want it.

http://www.fedka.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=24&products_id=420

Oh, foo. He's got an Orion in stock too... I hate being broke...

http://www.fedka.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=24&products_id=421

William
 
wow.. that looks sweet.. if it included a brightline finder I'd buy it in the next 30 seconds.. but I'm wondering how it would compare to the CV Color-Skopar
 
I've been hemming and hawing over picking up a 21mm in the near future.. any idea how much a viewfinder would run?
 
New from Cameraquest is $128. Gotta be something out there cheaper. Plus if you go for this one, ask Yuri. He might have one around somewhere too (perhaps from a Russar 20mm?)

William
 
Just do your shopping/research well. Not all finders frame exactly the same on different body models (consider the rangefinder base, location of flash shoe for original manufacturer's target model, etc. etc.)
 
JoeFriday said:
wow.. that looks sweet.. if it included a brightline finder I'd buy it in the next 30 seconds.. but I'm wondering how it would compare to the CV Color-Skopar
You do not want the Kobalux finder Brett - barrel distortion. I bought an FSU 20mm finder to use with my 21 and never used the Kobalux. The Russian one is 20mm, is optically excellent and has mechanical parallax built in. I think I paid $95 for mine but it was worth every penny.

No comparison between the Kobalux/Pasoptik/Avenon/Bower and the CV 21. As you say the optics are fantastic and the build quality is out of this world - it is a gem.

celluloidprop said:
Was the second-generation superior/inferior to the 8-blade third, or were they essentially identical (performance-wise)?
My understanding was that the optics were actually the same. The mechanics were slightly different - more aperture blades on the 3rd gen and the 3rd gen focuses down to 0.7M whereas the 2nd gen focuses down to 0.9M.

Two pics below: a close-up of the side and sitting on an M7.

 
Back
Top Bottom