kshapero
South Florida Man
I shoot mainly color (then convert to B/W if I wish to) negs. I have tried most every brand. 400 ISO seems to be the comfort zone. Now that I have Photoshop Elements 5.0, I can pretty much make any exposure have good skin tone, good highlights, shadows, etc. So I think,
I am going back to Walgreens (Agfa?) 400 ISO for the price. Am I missing something? Am I perverting the true RF faith?
:angel:
:angel:
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
I doubt that Walgreens 400 is still Agfa except for "old" stock. But Petzi, over on APUG, seems to have a supply of Agfa Optima 400 in 100ft rolls.
Dunno why any film with post-processing for display or digital processing would be untrue to the RF faith. I don't know how to do conversion to b&w well, so I just shoot Tri-X ... also because Tri-X is an old friend that I know well, and I like it.
Dunno why any film with post-processing for display or digital processing would be untrue to the RF faith. I don't know how to do conversion to b&w well, so I just shoot Tri-X ... also because Tri-X is an old friend that I know well, and I like it.
jan normandale
Film is the other way
Akiva , I think people did all sorts of things in darkrooms before PS. So emulate the greats like A Adams and work the negative as you wish. Dodging and burning were created long before PS. Theres a long standing tradition of working with a negative to change the image to match the photographers perception of the original shot or even 'improve' upon it
kshapero
South Florida Man
Bottom line is still, as always, the photographer's eye.
Madrigal
Three-Shot Rose
I'm afraid Trius is right, kshapero. I got a $2 roll of film from Walgreens recently that had Made In Japan printed on it. Admittedly, I got it only for a practice roll for loading my developing tank. The only time I got Walgreens film, I liked nothing about the results.
I simply love Reala for color, and Fuji color film, generally.
I simply love Reala for color, and Fuji color film, generally.
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
I have a few rolls of Walgreens/Agfa 200 left, and just today received 9 rolls of 24exp Shur-Fine/Agfa 200 from an eBay purchase.
R
rich815
Guest
kshapero said:....Now that I have Photoshop Elements 5.0, I can pretty much make any exposure have good skin tone, good highlights, shadows, etc.
:angel:
Please! Share this miracle method with us! I worry too much about exposure, development and processing in order to get good skin tones, highlights and shadows!
tkluck
Well-known
jan normandale said:Akiva , I think people did all sorts of things in darkrooms before PS. So emulate the greats like A Adams and work the negative as you wish. Dodging and burning were created long before PS. Theres a long standing tradition of working with a negative to change the image to match the photographers perception of the original shot or even 'improve' upon it
Playboy was certainly doing it long before Photo Shop...
dmr
Registered Abuser
The new Walgreens 400 film is definitely Fuji. I haven't seen any of the old Agfa 400 in stock for a long time, but the Walgreens I frequent just got a whole bunch more of the older Agfa 200, $1 per roll, factory printed price on the box.
I had only so-so luck with the older Walgreens/Agfa 400. Fuji gives me a much smoother appearance. I have had good luck with the Walgreens/Agfa 200.
I had only so-so luck with the older Walgreens/Agfa 400. Fuji gives me a much smoother appearance. I have had good luck with the Walgreens/Agfa 200.
Share: