aizan
Veteran
whenever mike johnston says something about being able to identify all sorts of lens aberrations and really describe a lens's performance, i always get a little jealous. i just don't really know what's going on, and that would partly explain why i'm drawn to the most fully "corrected" lenses like the 50mm summilux asph and 35mm summicron asph instead of risk being disappointed by lenses that might "misbehave."
it would be really useful to know what the various lens aberrations are and how they affect the image, at least the more esoteric ones. if someone says a lens has this or that, you'd know what to expect and be able to decide whether you're ok with that or not. or if a lens you're using is doing something you don't like, you can look for one that doesn't do it.
does anyone know a good non-technical reference with illustrations from real world examples?
it would be really useful to know what the various lens aberrations are and how they affect the image, at least the more esoteric ones. if someone says a lens has this or that, you'd know what to expect and be able to decide whether you're ok with that or not. or if a lens you're using is doing something you don't like, you can look for one that doesn't do it.
does anyone know a good non-technical reference with illustrations from real world examples?