steve garza said:
The only problem I have so i in scanning slides from SCALA. I have beautiful, contrasty pictures shot w/ my G, but the scans are extremely dark and lose all definition. Can anyone offer a suggestion?
Well, I had a few issues like that while I was climbing the learning curve at first with that thing, but ...
Here's what I found out works best for me, anyway.
Under preferences:
Auto exposure for both negatives and slides.
Auto focus at scan OFF (see below).
Color depth at 16 bit
Multi sample at 2x
Then set input resolution to 3200 on main screen.
Here's the procedure I use, both for negatives and slides, and even though it's sometimes a bit tedious, it has given me great scans.
I scan color negatives using the color negative setting and color slides using color positive setting.
First, do an index scan.
Next, prescan, followed by an auto-crop and an auto focus targeted on something in the image showing detail that is part way off center. This will re-prescan.
Then I select image correction, go to the left to histogram and adjust the R, G, and B if there are flat-lines at either extreme.
Then a scan for real, onto a huge 16 bit .tif file.
Then I take that .tif file into photoshop and adjust as needed, resize, and save either as a photoshop file or a .jpg for the web or to share.
I do any usm or anything fancy in photoshop, and keep the original .tif as is as long as the disk space is there.
I've found that for slides, if it's anywhere near a normal looking slide, you can make a great scan and the end result on the monitor will compare quite well visually with what's on the slide itself.
I'm still experimenting and learning, but I've done many slides this way and had real good luck.
Hope this helps.
🙂