Darkhorse
pointed and shot
I've been in a gassy mood lately. I've been looking at larger medium format systems, but in my heart of hearts I'm fundamentally a light-weight shooter. I don't like packing heavy gear, and I just like things small. This is one of the reasons why I love the OM system... a system that's been getting bigger with the addition of more lenses.
I've considered getting a Leica, but the cost is rather high. Maybe I'm just frugal, I don't know. But I've been getting the urge to get some German glass.
Suddenly today I remembered the local shop had a Rollei 35 and I jumped right in.
The price was fine, and it also came with a flash. Glass looks totally clean, came with the lens cap an a UV filter as well. Speeds seem OK, but struggled a bit at the lower end, but now seems fine after a few shots.
There is, however, the issue of the battery. I'm not sure what to do here. Aside from that, looking inside I discovered there's no cap for the battery:
This being a mechanical camera, I know I don't need the battery. Still, I don't want to have to drag around a light meter as well... or Sunny 16 things.
Any tips?
I've considered getting a Leica, but the cost is rather high. Maybe I'm just frugal, I don't know. But I've been getting the urge to get some German glass.
Suddenly today I remembered the local shop had a Rollei 35 and I jumped right in.

The price was fine, and it also came with a flash. Glass looks totally clean, came with the lens cap an a UV filter as well. Speeds seem OK, but struggled a bit at the lower end, but now seems fine after a few shots.
There is, however, the issue of the battery. I'm not sure what to do here. Aside from that, looking inside I discovered there's no cap for the battery:

This being a mechanical camera, I know I don't need the battery. Still, I don't want to have to drag around a light meter as well... or Sunny 16 things.
Any tips?
FrankS
Registered User
That's a classy impulse buy!
Pictured IS the cap to the battery chamber. Unscrew it.
Pictured IS the cap to the battery chamber. Unscrew it.
snausages
Well-known
Looks beautiful. As for MF, just a hunch, but for the type of shooting I've seen you do, I think you'd be really happy with an old Rollei TLR. They're not that heavy, the VF is thrilling and the fixed lens will quell any system-building compulsions...
Darkhorse
pointed and shot
That's a classy impulse buy!
Pictured IS the cap to the battery chamber. Unscrew it.
OK now i just feel silly. Honestly, at first glance I thought that was the hole in which the battery was supposed to go. Just opened it up and there's a battery in there! I didn't see any signs of life to the meter in the store. Just now I went outside and there are just barely signs of life. The sun gave a reading of ƒ2.8@ 1/30. I think it's dead.
snausages, I have an Autocord, and that's a perfectly light weight and optically wonderful camera. Regrettably I don't use it all that often much to my chagrin. Maybe I need a different focus screen for it because I constantly second guess myself while awkwardly trying to focus. I realize this is scale focus, but it's more easy to see the distance markings on this than a TLR.
kuvvy
Well-known
Darkhorse your not the first to have thought that about the battery, I did wonder too when I picked up these two a short while ago. Though I'm only on my second roll in both I'm already finding I prefer the 35. I think it's to do with the viewfinder being on the corner. Being a spectacle wearer I think it makes it a tad easier. May sell on the LED but not decided for sure.

Darkhorse
pointed and shot
Good to know kuvvy, I wear glasses as well.
Steve Bellayr
Veteran
I use a criscam converter, a little pricey but that's that no need to worry. Also, Kohscamera has hoods and I believe filters for the Rollei 35.
petronius
Veteran
That´s a nice camera, darkhorse. Don´t think about the battery, it´s not so difficult to estimate the right exposure.
andredossantos
Well-known
Don't these take mercury batteries? If you don't want to estimate, then a converter for a silver dioxide battery is probably the way to go.
Mablo
Well-known
Mine has the battery conversion job done but still the meter is almost useless. One day I just tossed the battery and never looked back.
Rollei 35 is a great camera and it has killed my GAS for a Barnack Leica.
Rollei 35 is a great camera and it has killed my GAS for a Barnack Leica.
John Lawrence
Well-known
Nice camera - love the black Rollei 35s and another vote for the battery converter.
Have fun with it.
John
Have fun with it.
John
lxmike
M2 fan.
Well done a great buy and looks nicer than mine, as for the cap, hey weve all made mistakes, anyway the lens on the 35S is superb and the shutter nice and quiet, congratulations
FrankHarries
Well-known
If you send me a print of one of your pictueres I will send you a rubber lens hood for the Rollei 35 S 
(PM me your adress)
(PM me your adress)
Last edited:
Darkhorse
pointed and shot
I've only been able to test the camera by taking a walk around the block. Using it reminded me of using my oft missed Oly 35RC... except the winder is on the other side of course. Actually composing with the camera is simpler because you don't have to worry about focusing through it... focusing itself is another challenge, and that'll just come with experience I think. I did OK in that regard... although one shot I really wanted was too blurry.
It's hard to gauge the sharpness of the images with my V500. Although I will say that I needed to sharpen the sharp shots significantly less than I do with shots from my OM system.
These are from a roll of Tri-X I metered at 250 and put in Rodinal 1:50 for about 9:30. I wanted some shadow detail, and indeed got some, but the negs weren't that dense. Probably could've used another minute maybe?
I have some 160NC in the camera now.
It's hard to gauge the sharpness of the images with my V500. Although I will say that I needed to sharpen the sharp shots significantly less than I do with shots from my OM system.
These are from a roll of Tri-X I metered at 250 and put in Rodinal 1:50 for about 9:30. I wanted some shadow detail, and indeed got some, but the negs weren't that dense. Probably could've used another minute maybe?
I have some 160NC in the camera now.




shyoon
Well-known
I love everything about my Rollei 35SE except the scale focusing - for a guy who likes to shoot in low light with ISO1600 film, it's a lottery with no room for error.
oftheherd
Veteran
Photos look good. You are doing fine with that camera and development from the looks of it. Of course, since this is internet and an uncalibrated monitor, you may be right about needing another minute. I used to lust for one of those cameras. Now that I have the XA, I am well satisfied.
Darkhorse
pointed and shot
Thanks.
I had an XA, but not for very long. Trying to adjust the faint RF patch with glasses on was tough, plus I didn't find the lens sharp enough to my taste. But I can fully appreciate the appeal of that camera.
I had an XA, but not for very long. Trying to adjust the faint RF patch with glasses on was tough, plus I didn't find the lens sharp enough to my taste. But I can fully appreciate the appeal of that camera.
robbeiflex
Well-known
I recently got one too! Mine has been converted to use modern batteries. So far it seems the meter works perfectly in bright light when you could easily use sunny 16, and is not very accurate in lower light when you really need it. I don't plan to use it as a night time camera, so it's not a big issue, but I will have to learn a similar rule to sunny 16 for shooting indoors.
I've posted this before on another thread, but just can't resist, here it is hanging around in my kitchen:
Cheers,
Rob
I've posted this before on another thread, but just can't resist, here it is hanging around in my kitchen:

Cheers,
Rob
Mablo
Well-known
I have a cheat sheet taped on the back of my 35. It helps sometimes:
ISO 400 - Outside:
1/250 - f/11 - bright overcast or regular day
1/250 - f/8 - overcast (indistinct shadow)
1/250 - f/5.6 - heavy overcast (no shadow)
1/250 - f/5.6 - subject is in shade
1/250 - f/4 - sunset
ISO 400 - Inside:
1/60 - f/4 - bright fluorescent light
1/60 - f/4 - subject in window light
ISO 400 - Outside:
1/250 - f/11 - bright overcast or regular day
1/250 - f/8 - overcast (indistinct shadow)
1/250 - f/5.6 - heavy overcast (no shadow)
1/250 - f/5.6 - subject is in shade
1/250 - f/4 - sunset
ISO 400 - Inside:
1/60 - f/4 - bright fluorescent light
1/60 - f/4 - subject in window light
robbeiflex
Well-known
I have a cheat sheet taped on the back of my 35. It helps sometimes:
ISO 400 - Outside:
1/250 - f/11 - bright overcast or regular day
1/250 - f/8 - overcast (indistinct shadow)
1/250 - f/5.6 - heavy overcast (no shadow)
1/250 - f/5.6 - subject is in shade
1/250 - f/4 - sunset
ISO 400 - Inside:
1/60 - f/4 - bright fluorescent light
1/60 - f/4 - subject in window light
Thanks Mablo. I'm going to copy the last two lines onto a piece of tape and stick it to my camera! Also in other words indoor window lighting is 6 stops below sunny 16. It might help me if I can find a way to remember it too: the Indoor 10 rule.
Cheers,
Rob
Last edited:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.