kshapero
South Florida Man
Can anybody confirm that a Sony RX 100 will fit in the front pocket of an average size pair of men's pants? I tried the Ricoh GR4 and it fit fine but the RX 100 is just a few extra MM's deeper in size.
James24
Well-known
It does in mine.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Anyone else?
f6andBthere
Well-known
I've heard the RX1 will require fairly deep pockets!
GaryLH
Veteran
No problem here.. Easily fits in my front jean pockets.
Gary
Gary
Captain Trips
Permanent Beginner
Front jeans pocket, no problem.
back alley
IMAGES
dress pants no problem...
BillBingham2
Registered User
I think the important question is how tight are your pants?
froyd
Veteran
Let's see some pictures!
...then again, maybe not.
...then again, maybe not.
back alley
IMAGES
i put the rx100 on my 60 inch lance strap...it hangs over the shoulder against my hip (high) and it fits nicely under my jacket...it's so light that i forget it's there...
umcelinho
Marcelo
I think the important question is how tight are your pants?
my thoughts exactly.
I'm considering getting an rx100 as i've been missing a really pocketable camera, the canon s100 now is cheaper with the release of the s110 (but they're pretty much the same) and i really like the 24mm wide lens, but the big sensor on the rx100 and its better higher iso performance is quite remarkable.
for reference, i have a vivitar ultra wide and slim, which is a plastic P&S. it's brick shaped, so no curved edges, also no lens coming out of the body. it's 3cm thick, so 5mm slimmer than the rx100, and it kinda already fits tight on my front pockets (i don't fancy loose pants). I used to have a Panny LX3 and a Ricoh Caplio GX100, which I'd pocket often, the GX100 is 25mm thick and fit alright, but the LX3 which is 27mm but the lens came away further from the body felt like I was too excited about the events I was witnessing... not so nice.
wish i could just try an rx100 at a shop to pocket it and see how it goes. not available anywhere where I live :/
kshapero
South Florida Man
nice, very nice. excellent.i put the rx100 on my 60 inch lance strap...it hangs over the shoulder against my hip (high) and it fits nicely under my jacket...it's so light that i forget it's there...
I have a wrist strap on mine, the wrist strap has a hook. The hook then snaps on to a nylon strap around my neck and shoulder. The camera then can slide up and down as needed. It will pop into my slacks pocket even. Won't fit in my jeans pocket though.
If I just want to use the wrist strap alone, the wrist strap wraps over itself and the hook secures for a nice wrist loop.
If I just want to use the wrist strap alone, the wrist strap wraps over itself and the hook secures for a nice wrist loop.

GaryLH
Veteran
my thoughts exactly.
I'm considering getting an rx100 as i've been missing a really pocketable camera, the canon s100 now is cheaper with the release of the s110 (but they're pretty much the same) and i really like the 24mm wide lens, but the big sensor on the rx100 and its better higher iso performance is quite remarkable.
for reference, i have a vivitar ultra wide and slim, which is a plastic P&S. it's brick shaped, so no curved edges, also no lens coming out of the body. it's 3cm thick, so 5mm slimmer than the rx100, and it kinda already fits tight on my front pockets (i don't fancy loose pants). I used to have a Panny LX3 and a Ricoh Caplio GX100, which I'd pocket often, the GX100 is 25mm thick and fit alright, but the LX3 which is 27mm but the lens came away further from the body felt like I was too excited about the events I was witnessing... not so nice.
wish i could just try an rx100 at a shop to pocket it and see how it goes. not available anywhere where I live :/
The rx100 retired my lx3... Rx100 is easier to fit in my jean pocket then the lx3. Both have part of their lens stick out from body, but rx100 is thinner.
If u wear your jeans tight.. Then may have same effect as the lx3...
Gary
bugmenot
Well-known
You said you wanted pics, right? Well, I shall quote myself then.
If there is one advantage the RX100 has over any other large sensor compact, it is the size ...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And my personal favourite:
![]()
Just for the sake of portability, this is the camera I'd like to have on the side of my backpack or in my pocket wherever I go.
One other reason this appeals to me is the fact that I do not need to carry a lens cap.
On the other hand, the disappointing part about this camera is the lack of a "Smart Accessory Terminal", which is what Sony uses for their NEX accessory attachments, like the EVF and such.
I do not care for a hotshoe on a portable compact camera, what's the point ...
Here are a few reviews and previews:
TechRadar, Imaging Resource, and DPReview.
![]()
SteveM(PA)
Poser
it fits but looks like ya got a wallet and a small can o' skoal shoved in there.
kshapero
South Florida Man
I wear my pants loose so pockets are not tight. The RX100 sounds like the perfect "have it with you all the time" camera. Is there someone who makes some cool skins for this rig?
btgc
Veteran
Do you really put cameras in [fabric] pockets? Mines gather lints, dust and what not. That's besides fact I don't like anything to hang down my pockets. Synthetic lining of jacket is different - and even then I have to clean pockets from time to time.
But that's just me, I have seen enough cameras clogged and failed because they don't tolerate alien particles in them.
But that's just me, I have seen enough cameras clogged and failed because they don't tolerate alien particles in them.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
I think the important question is how tight are your pants?
"Is that an RX100 in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?" ]'-)
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.