Huck Finn
Well-known
American buyers have been spoiled with the price of the R2. It has gone for much more in Europe.
Increased R3A price
- Thread starter hoppinghippos
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 50
- Views 6K
back alley
IMAGES
American buyers have been spoiled with the price of the R2. It has gone for much more in Europe.
and in canada also.
i paid 600 cdn for my r.
(well, 559)
joe
and in canada also.
i paid 600 cdn for my r.
(well, 559)
joe
Taipei-metro
Veteran
Exxon/Mobil sayz, American motorists' been spoiled and should be grateful about the $2.45 a gallon gas price today, the European's been paying $4.50 a gallon for years.
EVERYTHING is expensive in Europe,the tax, rent, film processing, angenieux lenses ,big Mac, electricity, water...
No mail order tax and free trade in US keep the R, R2 cheaper, a $499 R2 w 17.50% tax will be how much, $586, R2A will be $703, cheap or expensive?
If lens is your consideration, get the 40mm f2 Ultron($280 street), mount on your FE2, there you go, a R2a simulation.
"You have to get it today to beat the price increase tomorrow!"
Am I in a Ford show room?
CV R2, R2a is still the same price in Japan.
Of course I know the FE2 is a SLR.
EVERYTHING is expensive in Europe,the tax, rent, film processing, angenieux lenses ,big Mac, electricity, water...
No mail order tax and free trade in US keep the R, R2 cheaper, a $499 R2 w 17.50% tax will be how much, $586, R2A will be $703, cheap or expensive?
If lens is your consideration, get the 40mm f2 Ultron($280 street), mount on your FE2, there you go, a R2a simulation.
"You have to get it today to beat the price increase tomorrow!"
Am I in a Ford show room?
CV R2, R2a is still the same price in Japan.
Of course I know the FE2 is a SLR.
Taipei-metro
Veteran
Your forefather fought and died for an independent US of A for unfair taxation and social injustice to creat a country for the people of true freedom.Huck Finn said:
Because of unfairness in Europe,you have created a great country that believed in true free trade that the people can buy the best quality merchaindise for the best price. Now should we,you, like Europeans paying high price in the US? US IS NOT EUROPE.
digitalox
RF Extraordinaire
OK all lets not make this a political debate! Lets just wait and see what happens with the pricing, the camera is not even out yet. 🙂 Irregardless, ~100 over the prior model isn't that much for all the new features
Regards,
Scott
Regards,
Scott
back alley
IMAGES
i don't mind a price increase (lying) but before the camera is even released is kinda hard to take (truth).
did they really just realize, a couple of weeks after the announcement, that, gee, we made a mistake here, it's gonna cost 100 bucks more than we thought??(feigning incredulity)
i love cameras and photography but business is much harder to take. (truth, major truth)
joe
did they really just realize, a couple of weeks after the announcement, that, gee, we made a mistake here, it's gonna cost 100 bucks more than we thought??(feigning incredulity)
i love cameras and photography but business is much harder to take. (truth, major truth)
joe
peter_n
Veteran
They are either reacting to the demand or an increase in their costs. I'm sure they didn't look up the number in a random number table to arrive at the price.
Interesting that the price increase came after Photokina where they would have talked to a large number of people...
Interesting that the price increase came after Photokina where they would have talked to a large number of people...
Huck Finn
Well-known
Taipei-Metro, the Cosina website in Japan lists the price of the R2A & R3A as 75,000 yen ($707 USD). Is that what they are actually selling for on the street in Japan?
Our theory here has been that $499 was for cameras from the initial allocation & that there is a price increase from the factory for the next order. If the price has not gone up in Japan, perhaps this theory is not correct. However, the fact that Photo Village has now also raised its price does indicate that it was not a unilateral action by Stephen Gandy but that other forces are at work.
Just speculation . . . I wonder to what extent their new roles as "distributors" may be a factor for Cameraquest & Photo Village. In the past they have been grey market importers, free to set their prices wherever they wanted. This is one of the things that has kept American CV prices down. In contrast, Cosina has had a network of distributors in Europe. This extra layer of corporate infrastructure creates an extra layer of cost. Hence higher prices in Europe. Higher taxes too, as Taipei-Metro so aptly points out.
"Distributors" do not normally undercut their retailers. If, for example, B&H is now acquiring its CV products through Photo Village & Photo Village adds a cost for the service, B&H must now charge a higher price, reflecting their new higher costs. At the same time, the Photo Village price would also rise to avoid undercutting their retailer. This dual role of "distributor" & retailer creates inherent conflicts of interest for CQ & PV. They may still be working out the kinks in this arrangement.
Of course, if PV & CQ are not true distributors but hold that designation only nominally so that they can administer a factory warranty, then all bets are off. In which case, there would be some other explanation for the price increase.
This gets more confusing by the day.
Our theory here has been that $499 was for cameras from the initial allocation & that there is a price increase from the factory for the next order. If the price has not gone up in Japan, perhaps this theory is not correct. However, the fact that Photo Village has now also raised its price does indicate that it was not a unilateral action by Stephen Gandy but that other forces are at work.
Just speculation . . . I wonder to what extent their new roles as "distributors" may be a factor for Cameraquest & Photo Village. In the past they have been grey market importers, free to set their prices wherever they wanted. This is one of the things that has kept American CV prices down. In contrast, Cosina has had a network of distributors in Europe. This extra layer of corporate infrastructure creates an extra layer of cost. Hence higher prices in Europe. Higher taxes too, as Taipei-Metro so aptly points out.
"Distributors" do not normally undercut their retailers. If, for example, B&H is now acquiring its CV products through Photo Village & Photo Village adds a cost for the service, B&H must now charge a higher price, reflecting their new higher costs. At the same time, the Photo Village price would also rise to avoid undercutting their retailer. This dual role of "distributor" & retailer creates inherent conflicts of interest for CQ & PV. They may still be working out the kinks in this arrangement.
Of course, if PV & CQ are not true distributors but hold that designation only nominally so that they can administer a factory warranty, then all bets are off. In which case, there would be some other explanation for the price increase.
This gets more confusing by the day.
Last edited:
hoppinghippos
Camera Addict
What I don't understand is (no offence intended) that why there are SO many pple who have the opinion that a $100 increase is marginal given the new features, the cost of other brands with similar cameras etc? (note that 100 bucks increase is a whopping 20% increase over the initial 499 bucks offering!!! currency fluctuations btwn yen and USD is only in the range of 3-4% in the last few months) These form of reasonings are precisely what the businesses want us the consumers to think. but you can't value the increase in such ways. Its like saying hey I"m going to buy my nissan car for 10,000 bucks more and it doesn't feel right but hey a ferrari will cost a gazilion times more so its justified?
I think as consumers we have a right to make a stand to say what is fair or unfair business practices.
I think as consumers we have a right to make a stand to say what is fair or unfair business practices.
I think it is just that such a big deal was made by Cameraquest, and other Cosina distributors that that price was the same as the R2. I think it would be very safe to say that if offered for $599 initially we all would have excepted that as fair. But, the way things have happened leads to people asking why, which in my opinion is valid. It was determined (maybe) by the manufacturer that selling this camera for $499 was appropriate, including all of the new features. The only things that could have changed in the past 4 weeks to lead to a 20% price increase are 1) higher than expected demand, or 2) an error in the initial pricing. Sounds to me like someone goofed. The result is a negative impression, and a PR problem.
Allen Gilman
Well-known
Prices have not been set yet in Japan. I've gone to two dealers who estimated around 65,000-70,000 yen but added that even they do not know for sure. I'm going to check again tomorrow so I'll let you all know. R3a was slated to be released some time this month here in Tokyo but got pushed back to "sometime" next month - wonder if that will push back the release in the States also. The R2a is on schedule to be released at the end of December.
Huck Finn
Well-known
Darrel, isn't the term "fair business practices" an oxymoron? 😀
This all could have been handled far better by Cosina or whomever is responsible by saying that the price for the camera would be $599, but that there would be a special promotional price of $499 for the first x number of orders. I think that no one would have complained about the higher price given the features that have been added & early buyers would have felt privileged to have gotten such a big discount &, as a result, such a good buy. The way that it's been handled creates just the opposite feeling. Something lacking in the marketing dept. somewhere. 🙄
This all could have been handled far better by Cosina or whomever is responsible by saying that the price for the camera would be $599, but that there would be a special promotional price of $499 for the first x number of orders. I think that no one would have complained about the higher price given the features that have been added & early buyers would have felt privileged to have gotten such a big discount &, as a result, such a good buy. The way that it's been handled creates just the opposite feeling. Something lacking in the marketing dept. somewhere. 🙄
Huck Finn
Well-known
Allen Gilman said:
Allen, thanks for the info. What did the R2 sell for in Japan?
Even at 65,000 yen, that converts to $612 USD. 70,000 yen would be $660. And that's before any export costs or fees. It sounds like $499 would have been a steal if Allen's Japanese dealer estimates hold up.
Happy days for all of the early birds who got this $499 worm. Congrats! 😎
Last edited:
R
Rodinal Addict
Guest
I predict that sales of the R2A and R3A will drop off drastically once the initial supply is sold and replaced by a restock supply because buyers, like me , will be waiting for the price to go back down to a " street " price of less than $599.00.
dwpayne
Doug
hoppinghippos said:
Well, the traditional (and easy) way to do that is to not consume 🙂
hoppinghippos
Camera Addict
Huck: hahahahaha... oxymoron? that is so true, so true!! :O)
Rover: you made a very gd pt, it is possibly a very bad PR campaign that caused the boo boo. I think it kind of negates the "CV is a cheap alternative to leica, very value for money" msg, now its more like " CV is cheap, but it could be cheaper, but possibly still value for money but maybe not as much as before since (see pt 1) it could be cheaper"
I would like to ask if anyone knows the initial release price of the R2? for the R acc. to cameraquest, when it was released in 2000, it was sold for 650, now its sold for 250 (body only). so tt's roughly a drop of US$100 per year. the R2 is about 450-500 now(ignoring the sudden increase in price to 499 when it was obvious supply was gone but demand was still there, wait that sounds familiar...) and released in 2002, anyone know the release price back then? then we can roughly gauge the possible depreciation of the R3?
Rover: you made a very gd pt, it is possibly a very bad PR campaign that caused the boo boo. I think it kind of negates the "CV is a cheap alternative to leica, very value for money" msg, now its more like " CV is cheap, but it could be cheaper, but possibly still value for money but maybe not as much as before since (see pt 1) it could be cheaper"
I would like to ask if anyone knows the initial release price of the R2? for the R acc. to cameraquest, when it was released in 2000, it was sold for 650, now its sold for 250 (body only). so tt's roughly a drop of US$100 per year. the R2 is about 450-500 now(ignoring the sudden increase in price to 499 when it was obvious supply was gone but demand was still there, wait that sounds familiar...) and released in 2002, anyone know the release price back then? then we can roughly gauge the possible depreciation of the R3?
In the 12/02 Popular Photography Top 70 Cameras issue, which just happens to be sitting here within reach, it is listed with a street price of $650. B&H and Adorama did not list it in their ads. B&H was selling the Bessa R for $400. I do see that Tri-State Camera adverised the R2 for $570, Smile Photo had is for $500.
hoppinghippos
Camera Addict
if B&H sold the R for $400 in end 2002, that still roughly follows the $100 a year depreciation. but interestingly the R2 also dropped as much, roughly about from $600 to $400 from 2002 to 2004? so it is still about $100 a year? so the qn now would be how long are you willing to wait to get the price that you like? heh kind of like buying stocks or cars.
Huck Finn
Well-known
Has it occurred to anyone else here that Stephen Gandy - & possibly Rich Pinto - may be the ones getting screwed here? My understanding is that Stephen is honoring the $499 for which he took $50 deposits - the honorable thing to do. I don't know what Rich is doing. He can be a little looser since he only took names & not deposits, but if Pr & the pressure to do the right thing lead him to honor the original price, the he too is in the same point. Either way, he's got a problem.
Now that I hear from Allen in his post above that the Japanese dealers haven't yet announced a retail price, I wonder if the prices have been raised on Cameraquest & Photo Village for their ORIGINAL ORDERS. How much of a market can their be on these things? More than 20%? Could it be that Stepehn & Rich will be forced to sell these at cost or even at a loss if they honor the original price?
Maybe the Japanese dealers knew more all along than the American distributors did about this - either about the prices or about Cosina's business practices? One of the liabilities of Cosina's "no frills" approach & lack of corporate infrastructure is that it always has the potential for these kinds of snafus. Lean corporate structure means better prices for the consumer, but it may also mean that at times you get the rug pulled out from under you.
I thought I'd sample some other websites to see what may be going on in other parts of the world. I posted above the price on the Cosina corporate site. Both the posted price & Allen's dealer estimates are all higher than even the $599 currently advertised in the states.
The Voigtlaender site in Germany lists an RRP of $890 USD. (I converted from Euros.) Oddly enough, they list the R2 at $1017 RRP (also converted). This is the distributors website, so maybe prices at the retail level are less - just as they are for many cameras in the states when compared with the MSRP. However, they would have to come down 20% to even be at the current US price of $599. This was not the case with the R2 or the R, which both sold for much higher prices in Germany than they did here.
Robert White in England only posted their price recently $641 USD (converted from pounds). Oddly enough, this is less than their current price for the R2 of $663 (also converted). These prices are before VAT. (I think that the German prices include VAT). So, you will pay about $750 for the R2A/3A in England.
The pattern I see is confusing. European prices have not gone up over the R2; if anything, they are lower. But prices in all 3 countries sampled appear to be higher than even the revised price in the states. Furthermore all seemed to wait longer than USA dealers before announcing new prices. Bottom line is that USA dealers seemd to be premature in the announcement of prices & my guess what be that Cosina gave them some reason to announce the prices they did.
All of this makes me wonder
Now that I hear from Allen in his post above that the Japanese dealers haven't yet announced a retail price, I wonder if the prices have been raised on Cameraquest & Photo Village for their ORIGINAL ORDERS. How much of a market can their be on these things? More than 20%? Could it be that Stepehn & Rich will be forced to sell these at cost or even at a loss if they honor the original price?
Maybe the Japanese dealers knew more all along than the American distributors did about this - either about the prices or about Cosina's business practices? One of the liabilities of Cosina's "no frills" approach & lack of corporate infrastructure is that it always has the potential for these kinds of snafus. Lean corporate structure means better prices for the consumer, but it may also mean that at times you get the rug pulled out from under you.
I thought I'd sample some other websites to see what may be going on in other parts of the world. I posted above the price on the Cosina corporate site. Both the posted price & Allen's dealer estimates are all higher than even the $599 currently advertised in the states.
The Voigtlaender site in Germany lists an RRP of $890 USD. (I converted from Euros.) Oddly enough, they list the R2 at $1017 RRP (also converted). This is the distributors website, so maybe prices at the retail level are less - just as they are for many cameras in the states when compared with the MSRP. However, they would have to come down 20% to even be at the current US price of $599. This was not the case with the R2 or the R, which both sold for much higher prices in Germany than they did here.
Robert White in England only posted their price recently $641 USD (converted from pounds). Oddly enough, this is less than their current price for the R2 of $663 (also converted). These prices are before VAT. (I think that the German prices include VAT). So, you will pay about $750 for the R2A/3A in England.
The pattern I see is confusing. European prices have not gone up over the R2; if anything, they are lower. But prices in all 3 countries sampled appear to be higher than even the revised price in the states. Furthermore all seemed to wait longer than USA dealers before announcing new prices. Bottom line is that USA dealers seemd to be premature in the announcement of prices & my guess what be that Cosina gave them some reason to announce the prices they did.
All of this makes me wonder
hoppinghippos
Camera Addict
Huck: I agree that it could be anything, either the dealers are screwing us, or cosina is screwing them and us, or cosina and the dealers are screwing us. I guess w/o any further info it wouldn't be fair to say anything concrete, everything till now is mere conjecture. but like you, I do wonder if Cosina must have had some part to play in the naming of the original price, afterall you can't just pluck the figure out of the air. one sobering thought is tho (which I just realised), that for the price of the new body, one can buy a brand new Minolta Dynax 7 body. And if minolta can squeeze so many more functions and capabilities and metal bits into the dynax 7 and still sell the body for such a price then hey I wonder what the profit margin is like for the bessa R3s and 2s. (Not saying anything about SLRs or RFs, dont get me wrong, i"m speaking from the manufacturing / design costs pt of view)
Similar threads
- Article
- Article
- Article
