gdi
Veteran
I have come into a number of packs of this that is out date by years. Does it have any value to anyone? maybe I should try to find a camera it fits and test it out?
Thanks
Thanks
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Alas, it's almost certainly worthless after even a year. The developer pods gum up and you get streaky development or none at all. Sorry to bring bad news!
Tashi delek,
R.
Tashi delek,
R.
gdi
Veteran
Alas, it's almost certainly worthless after even a year. The developer pods gum up and you get streaky development or none at all. Sorry to bring bad news!
Tashi delek,
R.
Ok thanks Roger, then this is probably kaput!
I wonder if there is a way to do a rough test to see what it looks like - a test short of buying a camera, that is!
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Ok thanks Roger, then this is probably kaput!
I wonder if there is a way to do a rough test to see what it looks like - a test short of buying a camera, that is!
See if a camera store has one. They'll probably let you test your film if you test their camera at the same time. I have several cameras/backs you could use but I'm not exactly next door.
Cheers,
R.
gdi
Veteran
See if a camera store has one. They'll probably let you test your film if you test their camera at the same time. I have several cameras/backs you could use but I'm not exactly next door.
Cheers,
R.
Good idea - I just need to research which models take 669. I checked the date - 2001, so it may only be good for "special effects"!
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Good idea - I just need to research which models take 669. I checked the date - 2001, so it may only be good for "special effects"!
All models taking standard 3-1/4 x 4-1/4 pack film, or modern Fuji pack films. Any pro back except 5x4. There used to be ten or a dozen different 8- and 10-film varieties, in colour and mono.
Cheers,
R.
I've shot this film 3 years out of date with "decent results". The colors were a little washed out. 1 year out of date is fine.
I sent a Polaroid 95a to a Flickr Member that had a roll of type 47, out of date by decades. I figured that he paid a lot of money for it, and did not need to waste money on a camera- so I gave it to him free.
The pictures came out!
http://www.flickr.com/groups/polaroid_/discuss/72157600236839811
Polaroid 669 can be used by any of the Pack cameras. They are dirt cheap these days. A Model 250 is a good choice as it will probably accept Fuji packs. I've seen some people state that the later models with built in development timers are problems.
I sent a Polaroid 95a to a Flickr Member that had a roll of type 47, out of date by decades. I figured that he paid a lot of money for it, and did not need to waste money on a camera- so I gave it to him free.
The pictures came out!
http://www.flickr.com/groups/polaroid_/discuss/72157600236839811
Polaroid 669 can be used by any of the Pack cameras. They are dirt cheap these days. A Model 250 is a good choice as it will probably accept Fuji packs. I've seen some people state that the later models with built in development timers are problems.
Last edited:
Al Kaplan
Veteran
There were also Polaroid backs designed for a number of medium format cameras such as Hasselblad, but of course it didn't fill the entire film area, and Polaroid made a back to use the pack film in 4x5 view cameras. This particular back was often used to "convert" the pro rangefinder equipped 110 seies Polaroid roll film cameras to use pack film. The final 110 model, the 110-B, had a fantastic 127mm f/4.5 Rodenstock lens. Older ones had Wollensak optics.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.