Meakin
Established
A couple of weeks ago, I ended up buying a Leica M3 "set" (body + 4 lenses, very good price) - that I Intended to use while I wait for my "other" M3 to get back from CRR in the UK...yeah I know...bad excuse but.....anyway.😉
After taking a closer look I realise that the Elmar 90/4 that was included, is infact the reasonably rare 3 element version. Supposedly this lens renders sharper than the normal elmar 90. And thats more or less all I know about it.
Now this lens, is as close to a "new" vintage leica lens that I have ever seen. still in its plastic bubble, absolutely no marks, chrome very bright, glass perfect etc.
So, It all boils down to this , should it stay or should it go? - I've got a normal Elmar-C 90 that I have been using until now. But if the 3-element is "better"?....well, this is subjective I know.
I know that once I start using it - it will definately take on som "patina" as It'll become a tool like the rest of my gear and used as such.
Any opinions are welcome,
Cheers,
Meakin
After taking a closer look I realise that the Elmar 90/4 that was included, is infact the reasonably rare 3 element version. Supposedly this lens renders sharper than the normal elmar 90. And thats more or less all I know about it.
Now this lens, is as close to a "new" vintage leica lens that I have ever seen. still in its plastic bubble, absolutely no marks, chrome very bright, glass perfect etc.
So, It all boils down to this , should it stay or should it go? - I've got a normal Elmar-C 90 that I have been using until now. But if the 3-element is "better"?....well, this is subjective I know.
I know that once I start using it - it will definately take on som "patina" as It'll become a tool like the rest of my gear and used as such.
Any opinions are welcome,
Cheers,
Meakin
Last edited: