Initial Scans

This is a topic very near to my current neurological system, as I've recently joined the ranks of the 'Scanners". As many of you can likely agree, it can be an exasperating learning process that can turn even the best image produced by the most expensive gear into the kin of a drug store disposable.

I use a Mac with a Konica-Minolta Dimage 5400 scanner. I cannot yet claim mastery but have made quite a bit of progress in the past month and can share some brief notes.

The K-M software supplied with the scanner is adequate but has a tendency toward instability. Once it crashes it will not restart until I log-off or restart the whole o/s. The interface also suffers from that common malady of Japanese software: itsybitsyiconitis. Most of the scanner's functions are accessed by decrypting a dizzying assortment of tiny function buttons displaying icons whose meaning is so unintuitive that it borders on malicious. This is my least favorite software.

VueScan is a terrific value at 50 bucks. It can drive a truly remarkable variety of scanners and it can produce some excellent results from its default settings. But, as others have noted, its user interface is an instrument engineers' dream. Once you get the hang of it you can count on the software to do a good job. But, as there is no documentation to speak of, "getting the hang of it" can be a long journey. This is my 2nd least favorite software.

Finally there is SilverFast AI. This is not inexpensive scanner software but it delivers the value commensurate with its cost. It's user interface is just this side of the boundary of the K-M software's. (Apparently the German programmers like tweaky little buttons, too.) Quicktime tutorial links are sprinkled throughout various strategic locations of the interface. But don't get too excited. They generally lead to movie clips showing the screen of a fellow using some particular feature while mumbling to himself with a thick Germanic accent. It's not useful instructional material. Still, I've gotten the best results from Silverfast AI and it's become the software I use most often for scanning.

-Ken-
 
Last edited by a moderator:
d30gaijin said:
Interestingly, I find Photoshop Elements 3 a step backward from 2. Granted it is simpler, or more intuitive, for new users but it seems limited for more experienced users (IMHO), with one exception! For use with a digital camera shooting in RAW it has one of the best RAW converters I've used (PS Elements 2 has no RAW converter at all).

Don
I'm trying to get my head around this Don. PSE3 offers things like advanced 16-bit editing, Healing Brush, and the Shadow/Hilight Tool among its new features. No old features have been removed. Or is it the interface you mean?

Gene
 
GeneW said:
I'm trying to get my head around this Don. PSE3 offers things like advanced 16-bit editing, Healing Brush, and the Shadow/Hilight Tool among its new features. No old features have been removed. Or is it the interface you mean?

Gene

Gene,

16 bit editing is extremely limited in PSE3, not so in PSE2 (certain 16 bit editing functions are simply not available in PSE3 that are available in PSE2 so I don't know how they can describe that as "advanced 16 bit editing"). Additionally, the working window for editing is very limited in size in PSE3, whereas in PSE2 it can go to most of the available frame, so you end up working with a much smaller image on the screen in PSE3.

Please keep in mind that I have only three days under my belt with PSE3, and there may be a lot I haven't uncovered yet. But my initial reaction is that PSE2 is a better editor, more closely resembling the full version of PS (keeping in mind that I don't have the full version to make a factual comparative evaluation to. I've only leaned over the shoulder of a friend who has the current version of the full PS). But the RAW converter is really nice in PSE3 (I don't know what the RAW converter is like in the full version of PS so can't compare, it may be the same for all I know).

Clearly it will take someone with greater knowledge than me to accurately determine the differences because I am posting only my initial encounter with PSE3.

Best regards,

Don
 
Not my experience @ all. I've used VueScan for the past 4 years & it's never given me problems w/my Minolta scanners (starting w/an old SCSI Scan Dual & now a Scan Multi Pro) on OS9 or OSX. Agree that the user interface isn't the snazziest, but I'm not picky in that department as long as it gives me good scans . . .

StuartR said:
In any case, as for vuescan, I did not find it very useful when I tried it. In fact, it completely screwed up my scan multi pro. When I tried to use the normal software, it told me that the scanner was already in use. Finally, the KM tech support told me about the above fix. I am actually not too happy about that, as it is not something anyone would be able to figure out on their own. The scanner and software should be able to reset themselves fully when you do a hard reset...this is a flaw in my opinion. On the upside, the scanner has excellent quality. Scanning just takes a bunch of practice...just like a darkroom. There is no way around it.
 
Back
Top Bottom