agi
Well-known
And it's not even a black body. What the hell is this seller thinking?
Item number: 190299451994
No relation to seller of course.
Item number: 190299451994
No relation to seller of course.
ruby.monkey
Veteran
He's thinking, "There's one born every minute", of course.
sockeyed
Well-known
He's also stolen two pictures from Stephen Gandy's website:
http://www.cameraquest.com/min7s2.htm
http://www.cameraquest.com/min7s2.htm
Uwe_Nds
Chief Assistant Driver
Bill58
Native Texan
Hey-the USA is in a recession! The guy needs to make a buck.
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
They did use Blue type and everyone knows that Blue type doesn't just grow on trees...
Last edited:
gb hill
Veteran
I just hope Roger H. don't see this thread.
Last edited:
Max Power
Well-known
FallisPhoto
Veteran
So those are not photos of the actual camera huh? If he stole two photos, I bet he stole the otehr two too. I'll also bet that the actual camera is filthy, has a dented lens barrel, has clawed up leatherette, and/or has scratches and rub marks all over the metal.
This part's priceless: "As a side note, the Minolta 7sII and Konica S3 are so similar in size and features, I can't help but wonder if they had the same designer or even came out of the same factory." Yep; I think it's pretty safe to say that they both came out of the Konica-Minolta factory.
This part's priceless: "As a side note, the Minolta 7sII and Konica S3 are so similar in size and features, I can't help but wonder if they had the same designer or even came out of the same factory." Yep; I think it's pretty safe to say that they both came out of the Konica-Minolta factory.
The Minolta uses a cemented pair for the front of the finder that hazed over on mine. Could not be cleaned easily. the Konica uses an air gap between them, far enough apart to slip some lens cleaning paper into. The finders are not as good as the Canonet QL17l and QL17 GIII. Neither is as heavily made as the Canon, and you can expect more mechanical problems like gears stripping.
Cute little cameras with decent lenses. By a CL with a 40/2 for about the same price.
Cute little cameras with decent lenses. By a CL with a 40/2 for about the same price.
raid
Dad Photographer
The Hi matic-9 is as good, right? It can be bought for $40.
ferider
Veteran
Maybe he promised to put it up on ebay, to the wife.
I do wonder though when the FF digital 7siii will be released ....
I do wonder though when the FF digital 7siii will be released ....
Last edited:
gb hill
Veteran
Has anyone reported this joker for copyright violation yet. Stolen from CameraQuest!
Uwe_Nds
Chief Assistant Driver
Taken off ebay already.
Cheers,
Uwe
Cheers,
Uwe
retro
Well-known
This guy is selling one in parts for a total of $1,025.00
http://search.ebay.com/search/searc...saprchi=&seller=1&sass=lubbersn&fsop=2&fsoo=2
http://search.ebay.com/search/searc...saprchi=&seller=1&sass=lubbersn&fsop=2&fsoo=2
amhildreth
Hootie-Hoo
I missed the initial listing before it got cranked. How much was he gouging...er, asking for the Hi-Matic? If it's anything close to the total of the parts he's trying to sell off, he may have found a career far more lucrative than actually working. Assuming anyone would buy..
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
btgc
Veteran
That's like old tale about guy selling turkey on market.
- How much do you want for it?
- Thousand
- Wow, that's a lot! Why so much?
- Need money
- How much do you want for it?
- Thousand
- Wow, that's a lot! Why so much?
- Need money
agi
Well-known
If I recall correctly it was $450.
amhildreth
Hootie-Hoo
Ouch. I'll stick with my Vivitar 35ES I found for $40, thanks.