I have some dust specs in an I-61 and it doesn't seem to make any visible difference to the images. I would expect a lot might create some diffraction problems.
That's odd but I understand how enthusiasts think. A small amount of dust internally is no big deal. Even new lenses have some dust as as time goes on dust has a way of working itself inside almost every lens. On the front element it would have to be pretty dusty to be a problem. On the rear element it would have to be more than moderate dust to be a problem.
Odd thing, my 85 tilt shift lens has a tiny piece if internal dust that is in a location where it shows in the photo if stopped down more than three stops and becomes a problem. I'm going to have to get it cleaned I guess.
so far I have not noticed any optical degradation caused by dust, nor by fungus, really. what i am weary about and what does degrades optical perfomance, causes blooming and hazy image, is milky / etched glass and faults on coating, specially if on the rear lens and more so if on a wide angle
I think I can remember reading somewhere that the nearer to the film plane dust, marks, etc are, the more likely they are to degrade the image. This might be the reason why dust on a sensor or a hair across the film gate can cause such disastrous results.
A couple of my lenses have tiny, almost un-noticeable specs of dust (which might actually just be on the front element) and they've never caused me any grief. I don't buy lenses with the thought of re-selling them but I must admit that I would pay a few £ extra to get a lens with clean(er) optics rather than saving a few £ by buying one with optics with which I'm not confident.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.