Is RFF even relevant anymore?

Just perusing our RFF forum these last few days one can see new postings about film, film development, Mirrorless cameras, SLRs, L F cameras and lenses of all sorts and about classic RF 35mm cameras of the golden period , camera repair and of course about photographs.

So I say that this forum is still relevant as ever.
 
"It's somewhat astonishing that despite being open to non-RF stuff, this forum has not been completely taken over by the vast majority of non-RF users out there."

Exactly right, which is why the forum has stayed relevant. Things are fluid and flexible here, not fixed and rigid, and opinions are all over the place. I almost always shoot film, but it's amazing what quality you can get from a phone, and that's pretty neat. As new things develop, this forum is ready to go.

I doubt it was ever meant to be solely about rangefinders anyway because that isn't sustainable. It would be like having a forum for folders only, or TLR's. That leaves out a lot of people. Primarily rangefinders perhaps, but the different categories mean that almost everyone can find something of interest. The more diverse the better, and I think that a very diverse membership and sensible moderation has been the reason for its success and longevity.

We very, very seldom see posts that would be considered rude, or denigrate others. Go to Reddit sometime. I had to end my membership there because certain people were totally out of control, and even though many people complained, nothing ever changed. After a while you say this isn't fun anymore and you stop going.

Some good points... RFF was originally much more narrowly focused on rangefinder cameras. Under the same ownership there was DSLRXchange for the dSLR folk, which was eventually opened to film SLRs as well, so they covered a broader range split between the two forums. You see how specific the forums started out... I think it was Stephen’s intent to broaden the focus of RFF, and his influence that has made it happen. DSLRXchange was shut down as its topics were incorporated in RFF. The programmer has created other narrowly focused photo sites too, such as a Zeiss forum.

The moderation philosophy established by Stephen has continued a polite culture on RFF. Problems occur at times and are quickly addressed. We like to have this be a stimulating yet courteous and friendly place to hang out. I too recall the times when the Leica discussion areas on Photo.net got extremely unfriendly to the point it was not a happy place to be. A lesson to be learned!
 
I am not a professional photographer although I do an occasional wedding, baptism or other event for friends. I have Nikon DSLR equipment and am seriously looking at an X100F system. At least half or more of my photo activity is with an M3, a Retina or SRT101. This morning I am doing a wedding reception with the Nikon and M3. The newly wed couple are my age (upper 60s) and the groom requested some of the photos be “real” black and white taken with a “real” camera not with a “computer that takes pictures”.
As long as there photographers that continue to use film for their activities, this forum is valid. Keep up the good work Stephen!
 
Some good points... RFF was originally much more narrowly focused on rangefinder cameras. Under the same ownership there was DSLRXchange for the dSLR folk, which was eventually opened to film SLRs as well, so they covered a broader range split between the two forums. You see how specific the forums started out... I think it was Stephen’s intent to broaden the focus of RFF, and his influence that has made it happen. DSLRXchange was shut down as its topics were incorporated in RFF. The programmer has created other narrowly focused photo sites too, such as a Zeiss forum.

The moderation philosophy established by Stephen has continued a polite culture on RFF. Problems occur at times and are quickly addressed. We like to have this be a stimulating yet courteous and friendly place to hang out. I too recall the times when the Leica discussion areas on Photo.net got extremely unfriendly to the point it was not a happy place to be. A lesson to be learned!

Very simple for me: It was - and it is - what I need. I like the mood here, the mostly polite discussions (thanks also to all moderators) and the very large knowhow bases.
It is the only really relevant photo forum for myself!
 
Mr bartender in order to keep us relevant maybe we should combine all these new FF no mirror rigs into one category. Bazooka forum hahaha

Someone should start a poll
 
I don't want to be relevant. I want to to use what I enjoy, and to use a rangefinder - it means using a niche camera now. In relation to the forum, there will always be someone who wants to talk photography, use, repair their cameras whether being a film or digital one. Being relevant doesn't matter.

... "Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light..."
 
I like this forum. That's why I am here.
Therefore it is relevant for me.
As I am not the only one here being active, it seems to be also relevant for ten thousands of others.....🙂
 
RFF changed much in the last few years, as the world we live in changed and, probably we changed as well !

For me is a real good and interesting Photography Forum, it's a place where I feel almost home. It's like after work to spend half an hour at the pub just to relax, to meet somebody to chat with. And there are many experts here, so a huge base of knowledge is available, and this is a great plus!

I shoot RF and reflex, 35mm and 120, film and digital, even Polaroid... and all of these have a place in RFF, great!

I take opportunity to thank our bartender and the moderators for all the work done for a place like this, bravi e grazie 🙂

robert
 
For me? A resounding yes.

I've been into photography seriously for 54 years, and virtually every day on the RFF I learn something new.

It's fun, enlightening place to be. A big 'thank you' to everyone for their contributions, time, passion and knowledge.
 
So it is

So it is

This is what the Catholic Church has been asking recently - are we relevant? Yet, despite their boring sermons and pomp and circumstance, their idols and their icons, could the world survive an existential crisis without that religion? I don't think so. Cheers!
 
how have your computer habits changed in the last few years?

do you go to forums in general less often? do you spend more time on youtube, facebook groups, instagram, and twitter? what about blogs?

i've been spending less time on forums and blogs, and more time on youtube, instagram, and books. those scratch the itch for entertainment, photography, and information.
 
My computer habits have certainly changed over time. I don't go to many forums because many are dominated by just a few regular posters, or are troll city (Reddit for example). Google has changed the way their search engine works in order to maximize their profits, so you have to wade through tons of web pages to find something you were looking for. The idea that they track us and actually look at our emails is something right out of a science fiction story, yet no one complains or does anything about it.

The less I am on the internet, the better, and when my good buddy deal on my internet service ends in a month or two I am finally cutting the cord. It's easy enough to get online at coffeehouses, at my senior center, the library, etc. I really don't need it at home anymore. Haven't had a TV in 30 or 40 years either and don't miss it one bit. Next will be the smart phone. All I really need at home is a land line phone.

The internet is handy at times, but it isn't real life, and it's very addictive. It wastes our energy, time, and money, while constantly manipulating us w/ lies and fear. There IS good stuff on it, but not a lot, and the negatives outweigh the positives, for me anyway.

Boy, I sure won't miss looking at the news sites online!!! Yikes.
 
" but it isn't real life, and it's very addictive. "

I will go further and say that it even re-wires our brain with prolonged use, and not in a good way either.

It wrecks our attention span and makes reading real physical books (made of paper) a difficult experience, where as in pre-internet days this was not so.

I find it not "calming" like when reading a real book, quite the opposite actually.
 
Check out Rangefinder magazine, directed at professionals (mostly wedding and portrait shooters) but with next to zero RF content. Likewise, RFF has lots of diverse content which makes it attractive, helpful and sometimes just plain fun. 🙂
 
This forum has answered questions for me, it has introduced me to photographers whose work I've been happy to see, it has allowed me to share fotos through Postcard projects, and it has initiated me to showing my pictures online - so Yea, RFF! Relevant to the max!! 😀
 
Back
Top Bottom