gb hill
Veteran
Cost wise it's never been cheaper for equipment. I got almost a whole darkroom of equipment for free. I have seen equipment on Craigslist for practally nothing. It's a great time to start printing.
Cost wise it's never been cheaper for equipment. I got almost a whole darkroom of equipment for free. I have seen equipment on Craigslist for practally nothing. It's a great time to start printing.
I can't believe that people can slap themselves on the back for getting an enlarger etc for next to nothing (yes I'm jealous) but can also consider that silver printing is not in serious decline. You can't have a glut of virtually give away darkroom equipment unless there is a good reason ... the reason being of course that no one wants to use it any more!
I'm not spelling doom and gloom for wet print darkrooms because I would love to have one some day ... I'm just not prepared to look at my hobby through a romanticised rose coloured pair of glasses.
I love working in a darkroom but the thing I have noticed, and what has ultimately driven me to digital output, is that the prices of raw materials have gone up a lot in the last 5 years. Chemicals, paper, and film all cost more and this is where traditional process is going to get tripped up i think. I think that if you take the collective cost increases in wet processes you will get to a point where it just doesn't make sense financially for most of us to print wet process anymore. There will always be someone printing fiber base silver but they will be the people who regularly sell prints at $3000+. My guess is the point when things get REALLY expensive is about 8-10 years off. When that happens even schools like RIT will move away from silver because of the cost, and learning how to print traditional processes will be taught in a class much like platinum/palladium printing is now. In other words, Silver dies not when it's manufacture ceases but when the cost of printing becomes to great to get new photographers to take up the art. If you need an example look at brass casting, It was an industry tied to an art. Those who knew how to pour brass had a job where ever they went because every large town had a brasserie, and so many artists who produced some of the greatest sculpture of the 19th and 20th century also had a means to support themselves. Technology, in this case plastics, supplanted the economic need for brass casting. because of decreased demand the raw inputs to the process went up in cost and you now have a situation today where this art form is about to be lost because there are less than 100 people in the world who know both the technical and artistic side of things.
^ Do you have one of those blotter books? They work fairly well, if a little slower.
Artist Chuck Close still makes Daguerreotypes.
Vacuum tubes are still being manufactured for music amplification.
"Lost" is shot on 35mm film.
I'm more worried about honey bees.
You can't have a glut of virtually give away darkroom equipment unless there is a good reason ... the reason being of course that no one wants to use it any more!
Ha...the blotter book. Yes, I just got one last Friday and noticed that it said on the cover "not for glossy papers". Wanna guess exactly what type paper I have to print on?
So, I used the local community college darkroom to print Monday night and put the prints into the blotter book following the directions printed on the cover- "squeeze off excess water from print side onto blotter page, then turn picture over, letting the wax paper sit on top, and then compress with heavy weight and leave in a warm room to fully dry".
Checked the prints the next morning and all 6 had the wax paper stuck to the photo. All ruined.
Good thing the prints were fairly disposable (except for one......) since I didn't have enough developer in the tray for even development. Tonight must be successful.
Thanks for the oven tip...that might just be the way to go. Set the temp at it's lowest setting?
I prefer to think about it as "changing hands" 🙂
Of course since the user base has shrunk from *all* to *some* professionals/hobbyist, a lot of these fine enlargers would end up rusting in the landfills. But I think it's more reason for us to not let this worthy craft to fade away into history.
This is a call to preserve an art form, not to put on rose-tinted glasses as you mentioned -- which, is actually bad because I'd then only see my prints as having way more contrast than it actually does 😛 😛