Is there really cost effective FF mirrorless?

[Ko.Fe.]

How about a Leica SL ?

I don't have income for such old camera with 400 USD and only battery.

 

[maddoc]

Comparing the Leica Q2, M10 monochrome, and Nikon Z7II to my Sony A7, that camera ic close to perfect. The monochrome is second, especially given the quality of the RAW files but larger, heavier, has no AF option and a much more limited range of adaptable lenses. The Nikon is way too heavy and the menu is too complex, a camera good for the studio on the tripod. The Q2 has a fixed lens. The A7 has cost me about $600 last year.

 

[Ko.Fe.]

Comparing the Leica Q2, M10 monochrome, and Nikon Z7II to my Sony A7, that camera ic close to perfect. The monochrome is second, especially given the quality of the RAW files but larger, heavier, has no AF option and a much more limited range of adaptable lenses. The Nikon is way too heavy and the menu is too complex, a camera good for the studio on the tripod. The Q2 has a fixed lens. The A7 has cost me about $600 last year.

I'm spoiled with RP's high ISO.
With f1.5 this thing is like night vision goggles 🙂

ISO 32000, not 3200 🙂

Checked Z6, it is even better 🙂

 

[maddoc]

That looks good to me. I wasn't very impressed with the Z7 II performance at night, quite some high ISO noise.

I'm spoiled with RP's high ISO.
With f1.5 this thing is like night vision goggles 🙂

ISO 32000, not 3200 🙂

Checked Z6, it is even better 🙂