ywenz
Veteran
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7542953197
I saw that lens on bhphoto for over a $1,000 brand new!!!
I saw that lens on bhphoto for over a $1,000 brand new!!!
Lazy tongue, eh? 😡 Anyhow, seller seems to be okay. Just hold him to his word. When you get it, examine the lens carefully with a flashlight, check how the shutter speeds of the M6 sound, and shoot a couple rolls of film through it as soon as possible.ywenz said:who knows.. maybe after owning a leica for a while i'll get lazy tongue and just called it the M6 :wink:
I really hope this item is not shady.. price seems a bit on the low side, given the condition the seller claims.
Ignore hair and dust and superficial scratches. There shouldn't be any haze, unless it has been stored in a really weird environment.ywenz said:What would I be looking for with the flashlight? hair/dust inside the lens elements? is that all I can do short of shooting a few rolls?
richard_l said:No no no NO!!!!!! Want a great 40mm? Get a Minolta M-Rokkor, one with the serial number on the lens barrel instead of the filter ring. It's multi-coated and takes standard 40.5 mm filters instead of whatever crazy size the (single-coated) 40mm Summicron C takes.
Anyhow, a Leica body really deserves a Leica lens! But you were kidding, right?
So..... 😀 is it a plain vanilla Leica M6 or a Leica M6 classic? 😀
Richard
🙄 It's all hype about Leica lenses. Pay it no heed. 🙄ywenz said:With all the talk of Leica lenses being very good, how are these lenses when compared to say Canon's L-line? I'm coming from a SLR background so I'm familiar as to what to expect from the various L lenses.
Are you really serious? 😕 I would sooner part with my M6 than my Leica glass. A Bessa will take pictures just as good as a Leica.ywenz said:Which is why I might part with the Cron and opt for a faster and wider 40mm Nokton..