"It's not the camera, it's the photographer" - Nikon disagree

On the contrary I think this forum is a fine example of many people who think gear is what makes the difference in photos while they say they believe otherwise. The most popular thread is "let see your leica m" and all the popular discussion is gear related. While there are still quite a few people here who do believe and practice otherwise, I wouldn't say they are the majority. 🙄

...rubbing salt in our wounds 😛 I like this post!
 
Of course an equipment manufaturer is going to say this.

And deep, deep down dont most of us believe it - isnt it why we continue to buy new kit relentlessly year in year out?...........That new lens, must have it........ to be a better photographer. Gasp, must get my fix. NOW!

At one level I know its not true but I am as bad as every other gear freak.
 
You know what bugs me? People who believe that you can either be serious about photography, or a gearhead -- but allegedly not both. Care to explain this to me?

No you can be both, but it's just quite rare to have the best of both worlds. But I think it would be safe to say that the more you are into the gear the less creative energy there is being applied to the work itself, that's just human nature.
 
On the contrary I think this forum is a fine example of many people who think gear is what makes the difference in photos while they say they believe otherwise. The most popular thread is "let see your leica m" and all the popular discussion is gear related. While there are still quite a few people here who do believe and practice otherwise, I wouldn't say they are the majority. 🙄

I didn't think that forum was about showing off gear to be honest...
 
No you can be both, but it's just quite rare to have the best of both worlds. But I think it would be safe to say that the more you are into the gear the less creative energy there is being applied to the work itself, that's just human nature.

I believe Kirk Tuck recently wrote an article on how gear can help to (re-)spark creativity -- unfortunately, I can't find the specific article anymore. But if you're interested, check his website, or drop him a line, maybe he can help. It was a very interesting read.
 
Not as bad as the marketing "verbage" used for the launch of the "1".

Nikon needs a new marketing department.

They lost me when they started encrypting the white-balance data in the D2x, and hiding behind the Millenium Copyright act to prevent Adobe and others from decrypting the data.
 
It's fashionable to say gear doesn't matter. There are only a few people here who can claim they have not thought of what they want to use and just picked up the camera that happened to be around because someone else bought it in the past. The majority of us carefully considered what works best for us. Also, while a $100 camera might be cheap to many of us, there are parts of the world in which that camera is crazy expensive.
 
No you can be both, but it's just quite rare to have the best of both worlds. But I think it would be safe to say that the more you are into the gear the less creative energy there is being applied to the work itself, that's just human nature.


The gear aspect of photography is not a drain on my creative energy, so I disagree with your " it would be safe to say..." statement.
 
I don't use NIKKOR lenses or NIKON cameras, therefore I am a mediocre photographer. 🙄

I wish I could upgrade myself instead of the camera 😀. I have decent gear (OM1 + plain 50mm) and my needs are fullfilled completely.

Of course a bigger format camera, or that aspherical thing will be better. And the tempation is there.
 
Over the decades my interest in gear has lessened as I've tried a lot of cameras and my photos always look like my photos, regardless of brand or price. Marketing isn't vey persuasive for me anymore, as I mostly want the camera to just stay out of my way, and the way to do that (IMHO) is to stick with the Canon cameras I've shot for years.

The Nikon 1 is, though, an interesting camera. Heavily software driven with all the AI stuff. It may, though, in the search for simplicity, be too complex for Nikon's target audience for the camera.
 
I'm afraid bundling the new Nikon baby snugly in a Luigi case would mess with the whole ergonomic thing. Sad, though. Those Luigi cases smell soooooo good. 🙂
 
Had a wordy reply typed up but thought nah. Basically imo, when it comes down to brass tacks, professional level equipment is not going to (99% of the time as a number)) let the working photojournalist down. No one is going to trust using a third party lens in a hostile environment where lenses get taped down ten ways to hell. A photographer with the chops can make a really good photograph with anything if the assignment calls for it but they'll always fall back on their heavy duty tools when hell breaks loose.

and yes it's marketing which goes in one ear and out the other without pause 😉
 
Leica has said the same thing...just like every other company. Who cares? We know the truth so everyone should stop whining about it.

Not always. Some companies try to dissuade people from buying their products, if they suspect that they'll get the wrong customers. By "wrong customers," I mean people who either need something else, or won't be happy with whatever they get, no matter what it is. To quote a representative from one such company, "We don't want unhappy customers. Why would we?"

Cheers,

R.
 
And you know what, these days I am interested in getting new (old) cameras just to see how I feel shooting with them.

The correlation regarding quality between my photography and the gears I use has been settled in my mind a long time ago 🙂

Enjoy both, sure you can.
 
Nikon is right, if it wasn't for cameras and lenses and other shiny photography gear, 90% of amateur photographers would never bother with photography as a hobby.

Loving toys is universal, specially when they 'produce' things like pictures. Photography as a pure creative pursuit is for a very select few.
 
Buying a Nikon doesn't make you a photographer.* It makes you a Nikon owner.* ~Author Unknown.

No photographer is as good as the simplest camera.* ~Edward Steichen
 
Back
Top Bottom