remrf
AZRF
A young man (21 years old) I work with and I were having a conversasion the other day and it came up that I was involved in photography. He told me one of his interests was snow skiing and that normally he would buy a disposable 35mm camera when he went on an outing. On his last outing he had taken a camera that belonged to his parents. He didn't know the brand but it had auto focus. Anyway the pictures that he got back were horrible. He showed them to me and there were indeed horrible. But it was not the camera . The processing had been botched and/or the film had been heated at some point. Since the pictures were taken in February on a mountain covered with snow I ruled out heat problems. The prints were very flat and all had a pinkish or slightly purple cast . And one of them had what looked to be chemical runs down it in a brownish color . He is going to bring the camera in for me to look at and see if there is a problem. But what I got a kick out of was his description of the camera in the conversaion.
"What kind of camera is it"? I inquired. "I don't know" he said, "But its really old" he went on. " Its at least five or six years old".......
I had to smile at that. My Leica IIIa is 70 years old and my Rolleicord is over 50. With the exception of my digital every camera I own is older than he is.
He's a good guy and a very good computer tech and I am not trying to put him down. I just got a kick out of this conversaion. 😛
"What kind of camera is it"? I inquired. "I don't know" he said, "But its really old" he went on. " Its at least five or six years old".......
I had to smile at that. My Leica IIIa is 70 years old and my Rolleicord is over 50. With the exception of my digital every camera I own is older than he is.
He's a good guy and a very good computer tech and I am not trying to put him down. I just got a kick out of this conversaion. 😛