sdotkling
Sent through the ether
I consider this a personal mission to rid the world of the dreadful term "street photography." My feeling has always been that it's just "out in the real world" photography, and should not be denigrated with such a crappy name. "Street" sounds to me like "gutter photography," somehow unworthy and different from r-e-a-l photography.
How about "Reportage"? Whether you are a journalist or not, I think it works.
Who's with me? Show of hands?
How about "Reportage"? Whether you are a journalist or not, I think it works.
Who's with me? Show of hands?
greyelm
Malcolm
Sorry but "street" is fine by me. "Reportage" makes me think of an assignment to report on a specific event as opposed to the randomness of street.
kbg32
neo-romanticist
Sorry, but I don't find the term "street photography" dreadful at all.
"out in the real world" photography", pretty much encapsulates everything.
"out in the real world" photography", pretty much encapsulates everything.
DNG
Film Friendly
segedi
RFicianado
Now, if I take photos of streets...
MC JC86
Negative Nancy.
"Street" sounds to me like "gutter photography," somehow unworthy and different from r-e-a-l photography.
Rorschach anyone?
I think "street" fits perfectly. Just general and narrow enough to define what "it" is.
Moriturii
Well-known
How about just "photography"?
Mr_Toad
Fluffy Marsupial
.
I live in an exceedingly sanitary suburb....
So, I'm delighted when I can get some gutter in my pix.
I live in an exceedingly sanitary suburb....
So, I'm delighted when I can get some gutter in my pix.
tomalophicon
Well-known
You could actually be out on the street right now taking pictures.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
When did the term 'street' first appear? And where? And why? What is 'street' that isn't 'photojournalism' or 'reportage'? Did HCB or Willy Ronis do 'street'? Why do people feel the need to put their pictures into straitjacketed categories?
I'm with the others who just take pictures. If people who don't take pictures (or who take bloody awful pictures) want to stick labels on their work, or mine, I don't see it as my problem.
Cheers,
R.
I'm with the others who just take pictures. If people who don't take pictures (or who take bloody awful pictures) want to stick labels on their work, or mine, I don't see it as my problem.
Cheers,
R.
sdotkling
Sent through the ether
Well, then maybe I should go the other way, and sub-specialize in PAVED street photography, or even throw all caution to the winds and try Dirt Road photography, or even Suburban Lane photography...which is for a classier set of people, I'm sure.
ruby.monkey
Veteran
How about Photovoyeurnalism?
perudo
Established
when I read such a topic, I just think I should turn off my computer and go out shooting 
Back from finishing off a roll with the Contax III and a post-war Sonnar.
I was walking on the street while taking pictures. Walked up to the local cemetery.
Dead-End Street Photography.
I was walking on the street while taking pictures. Walked up to the local cemetery.
Dead-End Street Photography.
Jack Conrad
Well-known
Reportage? Nope...
I like the sound of gutter photography though. It beats roadkill photography all to hell in my opinion.
I go with gutter. Yeah...
I like the sound of gutter photography though. It beats roadkill photography all to hell in my opinion.
I go with gutter. Yeah...
FrankS
Registered User
I have no issue with the term. It would be interesting to learn when/how it originated. I also don't have an issue with descriptive terms for other, different types of photography.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I think the aversion to 'street' as a description is common with photographers who don't really embrace it as anything special or that different ... I confess to being one of those.
When I look at Winogrand's images I'm not really thinking 'street' I'm just thinking 'people and situations!' The need to give this style of photography a label exists as a reality for some I guess but ... not for me. Landscape's a tricky one too IMO ... does there have to be 'land' involved?
When I look at Winogrand's images I'm not really thinking 'street' I'm just thinking 'people and situations!' The need to give this style of photography a label exists as a reality for some I guess but ... not for me. Landscape's a tricky one too IMO ... does there have to be 'land' involved?
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
I prefer "urban landscape" - to me, "street" has certain guerrilla implications.
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
I can understand how certain words can have a negative connotation for one person, and not for others. There are words I don't like, like "juxtaposition" and "fraught." So I try to find some other way to say it. Not always successfully. For some, "street photography" may have a negative association; that's not hard to understand. There must be another way to say it. How about "avenue imaging?" "Public Photography?"
"Reportage?" No, I think not.
BTW, "street photography" works for me.
I wonder what HCB called it?
"Reportage?" No, I think not.
BTW, "street photography" works for me.
I wonder what HCB called it?
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I can understand how certain words can have a negative connotation for one person, and not for others. There are words I don't like, like "juxtaposition" and "fraught." So I try to find some other way to say it. Not always successfully. For some, "street photography" may have a negative association; that's not hard to understand. There must be another way to say it. How about "avenue imaging?" "Public Photography?"
"Reportage?" No, I think not.
BTW, "street photography" works for me.
I wonder what HCB called it?
Only those who havent gone digital! :angel:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.