ramosa
B&W
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...066+&item=120804190066&lgeo=1&vectorid=229466
Does his owning the lens help or hurt the sale price?
(Pardon the thread, but I was surprised to find this.)
Does his owning the lens help or hurt the sale price?
(Pardon the thread, but I was surprised to find this.)
kshapero
South Florida Man
Why would anyone want a certified letter from KR saying he owned it. Does that make a difference?
Mrbessar4a
Member
If you buy it you have to only shoot jpeg.
kbg32
neo-romanticist
Why would anyone want a certified letter from KR saying he owned it. Does that make a difference?
Only if it knocked 1.5K off the price!
Bobbo
Well-known
If it wasn't Jackie O or the Queen (or a member of Queen), I don't care. 
What a fathead...
What a fathead...
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
I have one in silver... and didn't know it was an old version. Did a new one come out already?
If so, I'll have to sell mine and offer it as owned by me at some point. It's an important issue that of tracking your gear's pedigree... 
Bill58
Native Texan
Why would anyone want a certified letter from KR saying he owned it. Does that make a difference?
As valuable as if HCB had owned it. (haha)
JayM
Well-known
If only the auction included a lock of his hair 
edit: On closer inspection it has a few too many streaks on the lens body from being wiped down with an alcohol soaked microfiber cloth.
edit: On closer inspection it has a few too many streaks on the lens body from being wiped down with an alcohol soaked microfiber cloth.
Last edited:
Landshark
Well-known
If only the auction included a lock of his hair
edit: On closer inspection it has a few too many streaks on the lens body from being wiped down with an alcohol soaked microfiber cloth.
Inside the lens.
It's a keepsake isn't it?
You can keep a picture of him in the lenscap too if it means that much.
mooge
Well-known
it's probably got cooties. 
JayM
Well-known
Inside the lens.
It's a keepsake isn't it?
You can keep a picture of him in the lenscap too if it means that much.
I think if it were inside the lens it would be considered a relic
thompsonks
Well-known
Don't buy it – it probably soaked up his poor judgment.
kosta_g
Well-known
Don't buy it – it probably soaked up his poor judgment.
we have a winner!
ps I think OC camera are just using it as a sales prop - given Ken Rockwell advertises them on his site. favours for friends, etc.
Mattco26
Established
Don't buy it – it probably soaked up his poor judgment.
Zing!!! His site is full of great information but his absolutes are disturbing. This camera is the BEST EVER for this, or this camera is Minolta's BEST EVER SLR just because its the one he owns. Does anyone else think an X-700 is better than an XD-5/11?
DamenS
Well-known
What I find funniest is that in an article on winning ebay bids, he makes note that he would invariably not buy anything off someone with an ebay feedback of less than 99.8%.
"The few tenths of a percent between 99.9% and 99.6% say everything about a seller, and the items you are likely to receive.
A good feedback rating is 99.8% or above.
A rating of 99.5% or below is horrible!"
The feedback on this particular auction is only 99.7% !! Gotta laugh at that !
"The few tenths of a percent between 99.9% and 99.6% say everything about a seller, and the items you are likely to receive.
A good feedback rating is 99.8% or above.
A rating of 99.5% or below is horrible!"
The feedback on this particular auction is only 99.7% !! Gotta laugh at that !
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
I can understand the case for let's say Walt Disney's pencil, or Josh Hamilton's gloves, but this???
bulevardi
Established
Or a fingerprint... on glass of the lens.If only the auction included a lock of his hair![]()
dogberryjr
[Pithy phrase]
Wow. It sounds like someone has begun to believe his own hype.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.