titrisol
Bottom Feeder
Cambridge camera was famous for their bombastic ads, and shoddy quality of their products
I bought a mirror tele-lens and a gizmo to take pictures at 90degrees in 1985
Both worked fine for a few weeks and broke.
Now the Kiev4a is a very good camera, I bought one just a few weeks back and I'm enjoying it
It takes a while to get used to the Zeiss grip and to the weird speeds
But it just does what it has to do in a very unobtrusive manner
I bought a mirror tele-lens and a gizmo to take pictures at 90degrees in 1985
Both worked fine for a few weeks and broke.
Now the Kiev4a is a very good camera, I bought one just a few weeks back and I'm enjoying it
It takes a while to get used to the Zeiss grip and to the weird speeds
But it just does what it has to do in a very unobtrusive manner
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
I just now re-discovered my 1972 Kiev 4 camera that I bought in April 1994 from the now long gone Alt Camera store in Toronto. Got some Fomapan 400 film loaded up in it and taking it out for a spin. The 1972 model was the last year of the really good ones and they started to go down hill in small increments starting in 1973 and ending up with those early 1980s concoctions that Cambridge Camera Exchange was selling.
Dogman
Veteran
The Kiev camera was actually a better camera than Cambridge was a camera store.
ranger9
Well-known
Maybe, but you're setting a pretty low bar there...The Kiev camera was actually a better camera than Cambridge was a camera store.
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
Let's not make too fine a point of it; "Camcam" (as they called themselves) were scumbags, as I learned through several experiences.The Kiev camera was actually a better camera than Cambridge was a camera store.
Share: