Philip Whiteman
Old hand returning to the fray
I start this new thread having read and digested the very useful advice available elsewhere on the forum regarding frame spacing. The problem with my 1981 Kiev 4M is not that the frame spacing opens up as the roll is wound through the camera (as others have explained, this is resolved by backing off the take-up spool clutch tension) but that, quite randomly the wind-on mechanism fails to engage on first moving the advance. This results in frames overlapping and double exposure of the overlapped sections - very annoying!
I have had the top casting off in pursuit of the light leaks the camera also suffered. These were spotted and fixed easily enough, but hours spent operating the wind-on mechanism left me none the wiser as to what was from time to time failing to engage. Certainly, the shutter chassis of this late model Kiev is so poorly cast the some of the gear wheels are misaligned - but none of these showed signs of tooth damage or appeared to be jumping.
So my question is; Has anyone discovered what actually causes the frame overlapping problem and come up with a fix - or is it, sadly, an unavoidable consequence of late-model Kievs being so poorly made? (Many parts of the 4M are beautifully made, but the built-in take up spool looks like it came from a cheap Hong Kong toy of the 1960s!)
I have had the top casting off in pursuit of the light leaks the camera also suffered. These were spotted and fixed easily enough, but hours spent operating the wind-on mechanism left me none the wiser as to what was from time to time failing to engage. Certainly, the shutter chassis of this late model Kiev is so poorly cast the some of the gear wheels are misaligned - but none of these showed signs of tooth damage or appeared to be jumping.
So my question is; Has anyone discovered what actually causes the frame overlapping problem and come up with a fix - or is it, sadly, an unavoidable consequence of late-model Kievs being so poorly made? (Many parts of the 4M are beautifully made, but the built-in take up spool looks like it came from a cheap Hong Kong toy of the 1960s!)