narsuitus
Well-known
What can you tell me about the rangefinder camera used in the new King Kong movie? It looks like a Leica with a normal lens and a bunch of attachments.
Fjäll
■̷̛̈́̉̓́̽&
It's a Leica M3 with a Leica Meter MC on top and a Summaron 35mm f/3.5 with goggles mounted.

jamin-b
Well-known
Whew, for a second I thought the big ape stole my set up! Mine's the Summaron 2.8...It's a Leica M3 with a Leica Meter MC on top and a Summaron 35mm f/3.5 with goggles mounted.
Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
These cameras get some exposure here and then... I wonder if it's good or just a sign of the times or a decision of the art director.
narsuitus
Well-known
Thanks for the information.
Why would a photographer prefer a 35mm on an M3 with goggles instead of a 35mm on an M2 or an M4 without goggles?
A Google search turned up one description of the Kong Leica as a U.S. military version called a KE-7A. However, since this military version is an M4 and the M4 has 35mm frame lines, goggles would be unnecessary.
Why would a photographer prefer a 35mm on an M3 with goggles instead of a 35mm on an M2 or an M4 without goggles?
A Google search turned up one description of the Kong Leica as a U.S. military version called a KE-7A. However, since this military version is an M4 and the M4 has 35mm frame lines, goggles would be unnecessary.
Hatchetman
Well-known
Maybe you own multiple lenses?
narsuitus
Well-known
In the movie, I only saw the photographer use the 35mm lens.
Chubberino
Well-known
Probably because it's a movie and it's a key prop that they wanted to convey a certain look so they opted for that. Really simple actually.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
Thanks for the information.
Why would a photographer prefer a 35mm on an M3 with goggles instead of a 35mm on an M2 or an M4 without goggles?
A Google search turned up one description of the Kong Leica as a U.S. military version called a KE-7A. However, since this military version is an M4 and the M4 has 35mm frame lines, goggles would be unnecessary.
The KE-7A is completely different from this one. This camera is an early M3, built between 1956 and 1957. (Triangular strap lugs, long rewind lever, frameline lever)
I expect for the purpose of a movie prop, the gnarly sorta-steam-punk look has its charm.Thanks for the information.
Why would a photographer prefer a 35mm on an M3 with goggles instead of a 35mm on an M2 or an M4 without goggles?
A Google search turned up one description of the Kong Leica as a U.S. military version called a KE-7A. However, since this military version is an M4 and the M4 has 35mm frame lines, goggles would be unnecessary.
And, actually, there *is* good reason for an M2/M4 to wear the Summaron with goggles, as this magnifies the 50mm framelines and you can truly see around the outside of the frame. So cool.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.