Larry Cloetta
Veteran
I was a little more surrealistic in 1964. But Kodachrome eventually pulled me out of it.
KodaChrome 1964 by John Carter, on Flickr
We’ve all been there.
charjohncarter
Veteran
The thing is, your image taken in 1964 is just as clean and clear today in 2018 as it was then!
Thank God for Kodachrome (and bacon), but I'm not so sure I was clear in 1964.
kiemchacsu
Well-known
wonderful photos here in the thread,
one thing i recognize is the colour of kodachrome is so special that i've not seen any current film can match it.
one thing i recognize is the colour of kodachrome is so special that i've not seen any current film can match it.
bjolester
Well-known
Many great photos in this thread. Here is a photo from Mombasa Kenya 1968 from my father's Kodachrome collection. Scanned on a Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400.

Mombasa 1968 by bjolester, on Flickr

Mombasa 1968 by bjolester, on Flickr
DriesI
Established
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
From the one and only roll of Kodachrome I ever shot
Decisive Moment, nicely done.
EarlJam
Established
April, 1947. My dad's sister.
In looking at all of the images posted to this thread, it strikes me that Kodak's success with Kodachrome was in having the right product at the right time: the world was ready for color after the better part of a decade of war; economic conditions, particularly in the US, were comparatively good as returning GIs bought homes and started families; and everyone wanted to create happy memories. Pretty much all summed up in "Kodachrome":
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day
In looking at all of the images posted to this thread, it strikes me that Kodak's success with Kodachrome was in having the right product at the right time: the world was ready for color after the better part of a decade of war; economic conditions, particularly in the US, were comparatively good as returning GIs bought homes and started families; and everyone wanted to create happy memories. Pretty much all summed up in "Kodachrome":
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day
Attachments
dave lackey
Veteran
April, 1947. My dad's sister.
In looking at all of the images posted to this thread, it strikes me that Kodak's success with Kodachrome was in having the right product at the right time: the world was ready for color after the better part of a decade of war; economic conditions, particularly in the US, were comparatively good as returning GIs bought homes and started families; and everyone wanted to create happy memories. Pretty much all summed up in "Kodachrome":
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day
I agree, it is all in the timing for everything it seems. Like the "Decisive Moment" in the pool above. Kodachrome was used to document many things in World War II. We have exquisitely preserved images now that bear witness to those times.
To me, Kodachrome was FUN and it put the joy in Photography especially for those who projected them... hmmm, maybe not for those captive audiences in a weekend visit sometimes, LOL.
I will project some this weekend myself... outdoors in the backyard.
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
Mackinaw
Think Different
Kodachrome 64 in 110 format. Kodachrome's fine grain worked relatively well with this small format. 1987 or so.
Jim B.

Jim B.
charjohncarter
Veteran
April, 1947. My dad's sister.
In looking at all of the images posted to this thread, it strikes me that Kodak's success with Kodachrome was in having the right product at the right time: the world was ready for color after the better part of a decade of war; economic conditions, particularly in the US, were comparatively good as returning GIs bought homes and started families; and everyone wanted to create happy memories. Pretty much all summed up in "Kodachrome":
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day
That is a great Kodachrome image. It looks so professional, but probably taken with a simple 35mm camera on Easter.
EarlJam
Established
That is a great Kodachrome image. It looks so professional, but probably taken with a simple 35mm camera on Easter.
Thanks. One that my dad took. He had strong fine art skills (that I didn't inherit) that informed his still photography, in particular posed shots.
I'm not sure what camera he used in that era and it doesn't appear to have been one that he kept. My guesses are either an Argus C3 or perhaps my grandfather's Kodak Retina.
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
Disappointed_Horse
Well-known
This thread makes me want to throw my digital cameras in a dumpster.
embee06311
getting back into film..
Save at least one of them....
This thread is less than a week old and yet over 100 photos have been posted and there are over 3,000 views. Maybe someone at Kodak is watching and thinking that there is still a strong interest in this product.
This thread is less than a week old and yet over 100 photos have been posted and there are over 3,000 views. Maybe someone at Kodak is watching and thinking that there is still a strong interest in this product.
dave lackey
Veteran
Maybe Ed Harris will join us!
Mackinaw
Think Different
Stanley Cup Champs, circa 1963. Original Kodachrome(?) or Kodachrome II. Argus C3.
Jim B.

Jim B.
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.