Kodak film expired May 1969

warrenjonuk

Newbie
Local time
4:12 AM
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
2
I recently inherited some cameras and with them came 20 rolls of Kodak Pan -X which expired in May 1969.( 2x 10 rolls all boxed and still shrink wrapped.)
I have no idea how it was stored and it certainly wasn't refrigerated.
Is there any chance it might still be usable? Or is it a collectors item as it is anyway?
 
I bought a couple of bulk loaders at an estate sale and to my surprise there was film in each. One was labeled "Plus-X 8/62" and the other "IFF 3/62".

I finally figured out that the IFF is Agfa Isopan IFF.

I exposed short rolls from each.

The Plus-X was fine! The IFF was badly fogged -- until the last few frames. I'm testing a second short roll.

But I was amazed that the Plus-X from 1962 looked okay.

Give yours a try...
 
I've done some tests with older films. The results with color are not so good, it ages fast. Black and white can be interesting though. The sample below is 116-format Kodak Verichrome Pan expired in 1968 that I shot one month ago (in a Zeiss Ikon Box Tengor camera) and developed in Xtol stock:

4577896189_b8a01bf280_o.jpg


I had an old film tank with a reel that could be extended for the 116-format thats a bit wider than 120. The light leaks are from the edge of the film and from a red window in the camera that is no longer red enough to keep light out. The negatives are quite thin, but this was not a problem when scanning them. Keeping the negatives flat however was not easy. I ended up having to tape them down. A few months earlier I did another roll from the same batch, also expired in 1968:

4414796487_ef2723dcb4_o.jpg


Here there is more damage to the emulsion. On the other hand, less light has come in between the edge of the film and the reel. I think the result is interesting all the same. I regard this as "toy camera" photography. I get a real kick out of getting results from cameras, film and developing equipment this old.

Of course, 120 format film would have been much easier to handle, develop and scan. All in all, my recommendation is that you do try to shoot and develop some of the film.

Last shot: Kodak Plus-X at least 20 years old (120 format in a Yashica TLR). This was developed in Rodinal 1+100 (stand development for one hour). I think the results would probably have been less grainy with Xtol...
4025835002_c3cece6bc7_o.jpg
 
If it's nicely shrink-wrapped and packaged then it is probably worth more than a couple of bricks / 30m tins of current film ! There are strange collectors on Ebay . . .
 
Pan X is surprisingly "age" resistant (wish we all were that). I have used 20-30 year old Pan X, "stored" in a black corner of my darkroom. It was a couple of the 50 ft rolls. I did load and shoot it. Rated it @ 25/32/50 asa as a bracket test. Seemed to work best at around 40 asa. I did add some Benzotriazole to the developer to cut the fog (10 ml of 1% solution/ 1000 ml of developer). I used Beutler developer 1:1:8. Cant remember the times - but if you go to our Flickr and tag "Panatomic X" you can see some of the results.
As for using film as a "display" item. Just use it and put the empty boxes up - nobody will be any wiser.
Pan X was a very good film, old style emulsion - long tonal range and, for its time, very fine grain.
 
Back
Top Bottom