Kodak Signet 35

chubasco

chubasco

Well-known
Local time
3:58 PM
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
270
I got this off the 'bay for $31 and it's been a surprise, has a 4-element
Tessar design Ektar lens, 3.5/44:

5544424513_8ca71e564b_o.jpg

5533713299_4593b0b80d_o.jpg

5520409022_6df01ab15c_o.jpg

5519342794_bbf27d17e4_o.jpg

5549621690_a1807fd83d_o.jpg

5549688454_cf36b736b6_o.jpg

5549650310_5ca4ac20f5_o.jpg


the camera, after cleaning
5515846960_fb690f456d_z.jpg
 
I have one that belonged to my grandfather. IIRC it has some shutter issues which I need to look at when I have the chance.
 
You just found yourself one of the (many) hidden secrets in the area of classic cameras. The lens on this camera is simply stellar (assuming you shoot around f5.6 or f8). The (L) coatings (lumenized), and the slightly radioactive "Rare Earth" glass (no worries, it's harmless) are amazing. The only downside of the camera (that I can see) is the slow maximum shutter speed (only 1/300) -- it wasn't a problem in the days of Kodachrome 25 ;), but today you are limited in terms of film choices. I usually shoot it with TMax 100, rated as EI 50.

Great shots, by the way. I especially like the underpass -- awesome shot!

Enjoy, and then enjoy!

P.S. Now you need to get yourself the Big Boy version of this camera -- the Medalist II :D
 
Last edited:
pschauss said:
I have one that belonged to my grandfather. IIRC it has some shutter issues which I need to look at when I have the chance.
Click to expand...

There's a link I'll find that walks you through working on the shutter. If
interested I could post it here.

mbisc said:
You just found yourself one of the (many) hidden secrets in the area of classic cameras. The lens on this camera is simply stellar (assuming you shoot around f5.6 or f8). The (L) coatings (lumenized), and the slightly radioactive "Rare Earth" glass (no worries, it's harmless) are amazing. The only downside of the camera (that I can see) is the slow maximum shutter speed (only 1/300) -- it wasn't a problem in the days of Kodachrome 25 ;), but today you are limited in terms of film choices. I usually shoot it with TMax 100, rated as EI 50.

Great shots, by the way. I especially like the underpass -- awesome shot!

Enjoy, and then enjoy!

P.S. Now you need to get yourself the Big Boy version of this camera -- the Medalist II :D
Click to expand...

Mike, yes, the Heliar-equipped Medalist is something I'm thinking about. I'd
first have to have it converted (at least the loading side) to 120. I've found respooling not as much fun as it sounds.:p Thanks for your comments!

cliffpov said:
Nice shots. I've got one of those that I got for nada. Going to have to put some film in it and try it out now.
Click to expand...

Would love to see those shots! We can make this an open thread for the
Signet 35. Thanks!

Also, forgot to say, the above shots are all uncropped, love the 2 foot minimum focus!
 
Last edited:
Can we open this to all Signet models? I've got the 40 that I picked up for $25 dollars, and the viewfinder was so dirty I had to shoot the first roll of pics blind. After a cleaning, it was much easier to compose a shot. The shutter has a higher top speed (400), and the design is more deco, but it is a nice handling camera.


6) Beauty shot by br1078phot, on Flickr

And a sample:


Tinker Creek_3 by br1078phot, on Flickr

PF
 
mbisc said:
You just found yourself one of the (many) hidden secrets in the area of classic cameras...
Click to expand...

Well.. Not a secret here in Tokyo where they sell for around 200＄ in the shops. Some of my Japanese friends buy them from US eBay for next to nothing. If you don't watch out you'll have exported these treasures in no time.
 
Lflex said:
Well.. Not a secret here in Tokyo where they sell for around 200＄ in the shops. Some of my Japanese friends buy them from US eBay for next to nothing. If you don't watch out you'll have exported these treasures in no time.
Click to expand...

Hah! Tell your friends I'd be happy to trade mine for a user Nikon F3 body.

:angel:
 
Thanks for the comments and of course, any Kodak Signets are welcome!

One more from the last roll, Arista Premium 400>800, Diafine 4.5+4.5 @24C

5555268500_396e4a778d_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
chubasco said:
Mike, yes, the Heliar-equipped Medalist is something I'm thinking about. I'd
first have to have it converted (at least the loading side) to 120. I've found respooling not as much fun as it sounds.:p Thanks for your comments!
Click to expand...

When you get a Medalist II, send it directly to Ken Ruth -- do not pass "Go", do not... -- life is too short for re-rolling film :D (he says, as he ducks for cover)
 
Could I get that link on the shutter? My google-fu has failed for some reason.

Thanks!
 
mbisc said:
P.S. Now you need to get yourself the Big Boy version of this camera -- the Medalist II :D
Click to expand...

You know, I like the original Medalist also. I've never used a II, preferring to purchase the first model. The differences as I understand them are:

Medalist "I" had a black anodized double helicoid lens barrel, whereas II was polished aluminum (supposedly, the black lens barrel was more stealthy for military use during WWII). Both lens barrels are nice looking (probably the most distinctive visual feature of the camera). I like 'em both.

The "I" had a fine focus knob on the lower right part of the body, but the II replaced that spot with a flash sync outlet. I rarely use flash anyway, and I think the fine focus knob is cool.

There may be better lens coatings on the Medalist II. I can't argue with that. But, I get beautiful results from my Medalist I Ektar lens.

Anyway, I'm sorry to hijack the Signet thread. Just wanted to spread the love for Medalist I.
 
wlewisiii said:
Could I get that link on the shutter? My google-fu has failed for some reason.

Thanks!
Click to expand...

Here ya go:

http://pheugo.com/cameras/index.php?page=downloads

crawdiddy said:
You know, I like the original Medalist also. I've never used a II, preferring to purchase the first model. The differences as I understand them are:

Medalist "I" had a black anodized double helicoid lens barrel, whereas II was polished aluminum (supposedly, the black lens barrel was more stealthy for military use during WWII). Both lens barrels are nice looking (probably the most distinctive visual feature of the camera). I like 'em both.

The "I" had a fine focus knob on the lower right part of the body, but the II replaced that spot with a flash sync outlet. I rarely use flash anyway, and I think the fine focus knob is cool.

There may be better lens coatings on the Medalist II. I can't argue with that. But, I get beautiful results from my Medalist I Ektar lens.

Anyway, I'm sorry to hijack the Signet thread. Just wanted to spread the love for Medalist I.
Click to expand...

I've seen enough photos from the Medalist to firmly convince me they
are worth getting, even with the expense of conversion.
 
Got a Signet 35 recently and am putting my first roll through it now -- can hardly wait to see the results. A very cute little camera!

The RF is slightly out vertically. Anyone know how to adjust it? Thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom