Nachkebia
Well-known

I love portra films and I think this news deserves to be here, so film lovers like me can enjoy it
Comparisons

Press res.
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20060911005436&newsLang=en
Here some demonstration and extra information from kodak.
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/portra/portraIndex.jhtml?id=0.2.22.14.7.14&lc=en
Gallery with some pictures here, mostly medium format
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/portra/gallery.html
Last edited:
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
That is a nice find, Vladimer!
At least it makes a change from the press-releases full of negatives about chemical photography that the Kodak company has been giving out over the last year.
Jamie123
Veteran
Nice to see that they still put some effort into improving films.
I love Portra, too. Unfortunately every scanner software I use somehow messes up the colors with the negative color profiles so I prefer using slide film. I still might try out a roll now that it the film has "outstanding scanning results"
I love Portra, too. Unfortunately every scanner software I use somehow messes up the colors with the negative color profiles so I prefer using slide film. I still might try out a roll now that it the film has "outstanding scanning results"
Nachkebia
Well-known
Jamie123 : Yeah, coolscann also plays with color, but what I do is, when developing I ask lab to print contact sheet so I know colors and later stange I correct colors with curves, but anyhow lets see how new film scans! CAN`T WAIT!
S
Stephan
Guest
It looks like they haven't changed the names of the films though. That won't make it easy finding some of this to try. I just hope this isn't just a chance for them to put their prices up by 30% again 
Jamie123
Veteran
Nachkebia said:Jamie123 : Yeah, coolscann also plays with color, but what I do is, when developing I ask lab to print contact sheet so I know colors and later stange I correct colors with curves, but anyhow lets see how new film scans! CAN`T WAIT!
That's a pretty good idea! I'll try that out next time I get a film developed. I have a roll of portra 400vc 120 film in the fridge that I bought last week but I doubt that it's one of the new ones.
Nachkebia
Well-known
Stephan : Read this http://www.kodak.com/global/plugins/acrobat/en/professional/products/films/portra/qAndAUS.pdf?id=0.2.22.14.7.14.20&lc=en
You will identify new film with this graphical type on every new package
You will identify new film with this graphical type on every new package

S
Stephan
Guest
Nachkebia said:Stephan : Read this http://www.kodak.com/global/plugins/acrobat/en/professional/products/films/portra/qAndAUS.pdf?id=0.2.22.14.7.14.20&lc=en
You will identify new film with this graphical type on every new package
![]()
Ooooh, thanks
The edge print on the film reads 160 NC-2 now I see as well. And the've dropped the tungsten balance 100T, but then I've bever heard of anyone using this in the first place. Fuji still make NPL as far as I can tell anyway for those who want tungsten print film (I'll give that a try actually, just to see what it's like before it dies out too).
Nachkebia
Well-known
Great great! we need more optimism in film! cheeer up people! this might be the last shake in a color film world! sadly 
sockeyed
Well-known
Yay! I guess that my local lab was making things up when they told me Kodak was dropping 400VC. I find it hard to get the 400VC here in Vancouver, though, and it's pricey.
Last edited:
leif e
-
Really good news. I discovered Portra only this summer and love it - even to scan. If this upgrade keeps it´s promises, then we´re really going somewhere.
leif e
leif e
Ben Z
Veteran
Stephan said:It looks like they haven't changed the names of the films though.
A welcome departure from their past history of sometimes changing only the names
Dougg
Seasoned Member
Delighted to see this continued improvement in Kodak film, bodes well for the longer term. And I had to verify they still are supporting 220 size film! 
sbug
Acceptably Sharp
I noticed this update yesterday when I was looking up T-Max push-process developing times on the Kodak website. I love Portra so I'm excited to try the new stuff and compare with the older film. I also have just started trying their 400UC which I think is a spinoff of the Portra family. That seems to be good stuff as well and I can get it local for a pretty reasonable price.
SDK
Exposing since 1969.
Stephan said:And the've dropped the tungsten balance 100T, but then I've bever heard of anyone using this in the first place. Fuji still make NPL as far as I can tell anyway for those who want tungsten print film (I'll give that a try actually, just to see what it's like before it dies out too).
Too bad they're discontinuing the Portra 100T. It's the about the only long exposure negative film in 35mm. Fuji NPL is only sold as sheet and 120/220 roll film. There may be some obscure copy films, but 100T is really good for night shots and indoor tripod mounted photography. Large format photographer Tim Davis uses the 4x5 version for his indoor work, producing amazing, big prints, with a quirky take on political and other themes.
I hope Kodak really has improved the 400 and 800 ISO Portra films, which were so much grainier than Fuji's equivalents. I really did not like the old Portra 800 at all, it has ugly grain, more than Fuji 1600. I found Portra 400NC far too flat in contrast in 4x5" for landscapes. Portra 160VC is pretty nice, and if the new version improves upon it, I'll shoot more of it.
Last edited:
Tom Diaz
Well-known
Great news! Portra 160NC and 400NC are my favorite films. I get them developed (anywhere!) and scanned-to-CD for pretty cheap. The good pictures I scan with my desktop Konica-Minolta Scan Elite 5400 scanner. That is a great machine and scans the negatives with no wacky profiles and no other strange results. Too bad they got out of the business, but you can still get one on ebay...
I also am quite fond of a couple of slide films, but I do not know of a reasonable priced, available service that will develop a roll of E6 film and give me proof-quality scans (1000 dpi).
I also am quite fond of a couple of slide films, but I do not know of a reasonable priced, available service that will develop a roll of E6 film and give me proof-quality scans (1000 dpi).
jano
Evil Bokeh
How do these do for landscapes? Specifically deserts and mountains? I'm going on a trip to Bodie this weekend, trying to determine what film to take 
Dougg
Seasoned Member
How about the BW400CN, Jano? Bodie seems more a B&W place to me. Since the chromogenic is listed among the new improved Portras, I wonder if it's benefited from improvements as well...
jano
Evil Bokeh
I'm definitley taking b&w (acros and efke are what I'm used to, and maybe foma 200) and I might try the bw400cn stuff. Never used it before. But I am thinking of some color, too, mainly because I just learned how to do the advanced vusecan scanning workflow with some twists that yeilds most excellent results 
thelovecollect
Established
that's good to know..
i will be shooting color negs excusively for a class i'm taking..
what speed do you rate these films at?
and what speed for fuji negs?
i will be shooting color negs excusively for a class i'm taking..
what speed do you rate these films at?
and what speed for fuji negs?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.