Languishing on the shelf?

Toby

On the alert
Local time
11:41 AM
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
782
Location
West Wittering, West Sussex
In the recent months as I've been doing the digital thing, and I've neglected my film cameras. So much so in fact that I was seriously considering selling my Pentax 67. Last weekend I decided to check the dates on my 120 film and start to use it up before offloading the Pentax for good. I saw that I had a few rolls of Astia with only two months left on them so I shoved some in my pocket put the pentax on my shoulder and prepared for its last hurrah. The light was nice if a bit low so I had to use the camera lens wide open - something I hadn't done in years - because the pentax can't really be handheld much under 1/250. I shot off a roll and took it to the lab not expecting much, just really checking the camera was in good order. I collected the slides today, and when I looked at them I was flabbergasted, I'd gotten so used to digital that I'd forgotten how beautiful slide film could be. It's strange how a single frame can re-inspire you. After I saw the shot below there was no way I was going to sell this camera!

PS this was scanned on an Epson 4990 - the original transparency kicks its bottom - bigtime.
 

Attachments

  • 67geo2.jpg
    67geo2.jpg
    144.4 KB · Views: 0
I just scanned some of the plus-x I shot as well - it doesn't exactly suck 😎 And to think complete pentax 67's go for £300-£400 now - bad for me but makes a bessa look like bad value for money.
 

Attachments

  • bwpark.jpg
    bwpark.jpg
    240.6 KB · Views: 0
back alley said:
there is room for both.

just think about carrying that 6x7 around all day...😉


I did, I shot a documentary with the 6x7 in the west bank and the weight of the camera + two lenses and the rest damaged the nerves in my shoulder to the point that three of the fingers in my right hand went numb. That was why I bought a bessa. However if I had to defend myself against a mugger I don't think I'd hurt them very much by hitting them with a bessa, but 5kg of pentax 67 with concussion-o-matic wooden handle...
 
that's very true!!

i have to tell ya a story...many years ago i worked in a camera store and on slow nights we made up strange games to play.
one such game involved the pentax 6x7 sitting atop a very light weight tripod. attached to the camera was a cable release. we would 'walk' this setup across the room by advancing the film and tripping the shutter. it moved the tripod enough to 'bounce' a bit and 'walk'.
 
back alley said:
that's very true!!

i have to tell ya a story...many years ago i worked in a camera store and on slow nights we made up strange games to play.
one such game involved the pentax 6x7 sitting atop a very light weight tripod. attached to the camera was a cable release. we would 'walk' this setup across the room by advancing the film and tripping the shutter. it moved the tripod enough to 'bounce' a bit and 'walk'.


That doesn't surprise me in the least! I think the shutter on its own makes enough vibration to shake a cheap tripod.
 
I've been going back and forth between selling or not selling my 6x6 stuff (Bronica sqb) as well. It's been sitting for 6 months now without doing much except for running the shutter a few cycles every now and then.

The RF is ever so much more portable, and the DSLR ever so much handier when using flashes.

But if I look back at pictures I've taken on 6x6, there's always this astonishment about how detailed and at the same time smooth they are.. You never get that with a smaller format, no matter how hard the digital crowd screams.. It's just too bad that affordable digital MF hasn't emerged yet..
 
Back
Top Bottom