graywolf
Well-known
If that large! I've never heard anyone with a good word for them. Also, I strongly suspect that quarter-plate (3-1/4 x 4-1/4 inch) was more common than 4x5 inch. The very thin films are apparently a bar steward to develop: I'd back Grafmatics and real film every time.
R.
The very thin films were in the 16 exposure packs, thinking about it they were probably intended to be developed in the 70's version of the Kodak B&W Versimat Processor. those were mounted in the darkroom wall, you fed your sheet film into it and it came out on the lightroom side processed and dry. Those were about $10,000 in 1970 dollars, or what ($100,000) of today's dollars? The polyester film was so thin that if it had been celuloide film would have torn easily.
I just posted a couple of photos on the blog where you can see how a film pack is constructed:
http://graywolfphoto.com/journal/2015/01/18/film-pack-construction/
The film in that 12 exposure film pack of Plus X is about the same as 120 Plus X film in thickness. About 1/3rd the thickness of regular 4x5 film, thin but not unhandily thin.
The sheets in the film pack are 101mm x 135mm, while the regular 4x5 Plus X in my file are 99mm x 125mm.
I wonder why I have such a hard time finding this info on the web and had to waste $20 to get it? The pack of film certainly looked shootable.