Leica 50mm Dual Range Summicron

venchka

Veteran
Local time
3:24 PM
Joined
Apr 24, 2006
Messages
6,264
1961 50mm f:2.0 Dual Range Summicron examples...


FH000004.jpg



Seafood+Market+Big+Sandy000010.jpg



Water+Trees+50-2_0+000007.jpg



Water+Stick+50-2_0+000006.jpg
 
Last edited:
252137509_c798b4f5ea_o.jpg


254736347_1a8fc6c70b_o.jpg


still trying to figure out why my m3 smudges the negative... 1/3rd of the way down from top. The first photo is with an M6 TTL. I think the lens is circa 1956.
 
Last edited:
Minimum focus distance

Minimum focus distance

One more at minimum focus. The dragon fly wings are 8" to 10" across.
 

Attachments

  • 50 DR Min 000020.jpg
    50 DR Min 000020.jpg
    557.4 KB · Views: 1
As I've said before, I miss my DR. I'd keep to posting photos if still had it ... and an M body!
 
Stunning photos here! Grrr....now I NEED one of these lenses. What's a good price for one with eyes and clean glass? $500? $600?
 
Really beautiful shots! I wonder if there is really a noticeable difference between DR cron and somewhat later versions.
 
lubitel said:
Really beautiful shots! I wonder if there is really a noticeable difference between DR cron and somewhat later versions.

I have a DR and in the past owned the current summicron (with the clip on hood)and the version before. The DR is better than the later ones for me. The rendering and transition to OOF areas is really special and colours really sing. Contrast is a little lower but thats an advantage for me, especially for scanned film.

Nik
 
Trius said:
And with Kodachrome, the fat lady is singing!


I plan to give my M5 & DR Summicron their first roll of Kodachrome this weekend. I only hope that I am able to "do justice to the lens." :D
 
Two more...

Two more...

I don't remember the exact particulars. These were taken at fairly close focus and wide to nearly wide open, somewhere between 2.0 and 5.6. The scans from Walgreens are low res & terrible. I quit using them. The last two are crops of the second photo.

EDIT: Presented for technical purposes only. They are not in the same league with the good photos here.
 

Attachments

  • 50 DR Table.jpg
    50 DR Table.jpg
    303.8 KB · Views: 1
  • Dill-big.jpg
    Dill-big.jpg
    288.7 KB · Views: 1
  • Dill-Lower Left.jpg
    Dill-Lower Left.jpg
    183.9 KB · Views: 1
  • Dill-Upper Right.jpg
    Dill-Upper Right.jpg
    207.3 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Lemme see if I can link to the pix in my gallery. There are only three and they were all taken with the 50 DR. I think I've managed to upload two.

Ben Marks
 

Attachments

  • 2006_0505_1811.jpg
    2006_0505_1811.jpg
    243 KB · Views: 1
  • IMG_1098-copy for sending.jpg
    IMG_1098-copy for sending.jpg
    185.3 KB · Views: 1
Thanks, Ronald. The DR 50 is a really nice fit with the R-D1. I think it is because the contrast is a tad lower than on a modern 50. I've also had good results with a tabbed Summicron.
 
Back
Top Bottom