Leica and Flash Revisited

35mmdelux

Veni, vidi, vici
Local time
6:12 AM
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
4,210
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Let's face it, sometimes no light or we just want a flash shot. What flash unit can match my Leica gear? Say with 4 batteries so it has power and compact too. I know about the Leica SF20 and the V800. What say ye?

Or should I shoot Gilden style with a semi-large flash unit via connector cable? What say ye?

Thanks -- Paul
 
I use a Nikon SB-27 with my r-d1. No reason it shouldn't work equally well on an M-body. It's a great little flash, originally made for the FM3a, so it has a legit all-mechanical blood line. In addition to it's ttl mode, which obviously only works with certain Nikon bodies, it has Auto and Manual modes. Powered by 4 batteries it has a decent recycle and charge life-time. Certainly much more than adequate for a camera that only gets 36 shots before having to reload. It also has a nice reflector for bounce mode, which is about the only way I will use a flash.

/T
 
Last edited:
I use a simple Nikon SB-E that is powered by 4 AAA's. The recycle time is not that fast and can manage a few rolls. It covers up to 35mm FOV and the only mode I can use is automatic mode. I only need to adjust the aperture for the distance I'm shooting. So far it works for those situations that require a flash, but I don't usually use flash with most of my Leica photos. 🙄
 
I use nikon SB22 and a canon off shoe cord . The sb22 is small, uses 4 AAA baterries and recyle times is pretty quick. It has Automatic mode, a wide angle adapter for use with 28mm lens and a flash head that can be tilted (bounced). That's how I use it: bounced and a small reflector card.

Bob
 
Hi!

Has anyone tried the new Leica SF58 flash on M6-tll or M7?
I think the price is a bit on the high side, but still thinking of buying one...
 
i use this little one. it takes one AAA battery but has a very fast recharge cycle.
IMG_1898.jpg
 
I just brought a nikon SB30 for about $50, It fits Leica M very well, and it can be folded down as a shade for view finder windows when you are not using it. The flash has very low output options for fill in in low light situations. For ISO 400 film, it can fill in at f2.8 within 2 meters.
 
The venerable Vivitar 283 and almost as old 285 get my vote. I have an extra battery holder for it, a couple of wood "dummy" batteries in one of them with about 30 inches of regular lamp cord connecting it to a microphone plug. A small cut-out in the sliding door lets the cord come through. Years ago I bought a 4 D cell battery tray from Radio Shack and epoxied a female microphone socket to the side. It fits in a belt pouch.

D cells cost about twice as much as AA cells but have EIGHT TIME the power. What kills batteries fast is the heat resulting from rapid discharge. It's about impossible to fire a 283 even on full power fast enough to heat up the D cells.

I mostly hold the Leica in my right hand, the flash in my left, and for direct flash I try to keep the light directly over the lens to minimize side shadow. I also keep half a dozen business cards under a rubber band on top of the flash head. Want to do ceiling bounce? Pull the top card part way out and bend it forward a bit to kick some fill light towards the subject. If the subject wants a card there's no fiddling in your pocket.
 
When I bought my first and only new Leica the M6TTL was the current model so that's what I have. It came as kit with the SF20 flash. It was five years before I used this anti intuitive bit of kit but when I finally did I was impressed.

Mind you, I wish it tilted.

Michael
 
TKS all for your suggestions. As to J.J.K. its not the smell of stop bath, its actually vomit on your dirty sneaker.

I see: you think now that you've figured out which ND filter goes with you Noctilux you're bright enough to match wits with me.

While I don't claim to have a very highly trained nose, I can tell the difference between stop bath and the inevitable, ineluctable result of viewing photos taken with on-camera flash.
 
Calm down gentlemen! Insults must be carefully worded and phrased so as to give maximum impact. Otherwise you may as well be having a computer generated bunch of random words in a forign language.

There are many reasons why one might choose direct flash. It maximizes the light for a distant subject, for one. Or when the art director says she wants a photo to look like it was shot for a 1950 tabloid. It's quick 'n dirty, but more than good enough to record family happenings with everybody facing the camera sporting big happy smiles, the kids opening their Christmas presents or the girls in their Easter finery. They really DON'T care about those shadows.
 
Hello Paul......I use a half broken 54mz-3 (the zoom is broken, I think its stuck on 24 or 28mm) but I dont really care...it works...I hardly ever use it, but sometimes I need it...I have carried the thing with me around the world for the last 5 years and it still works..I use it on my m6ttl...but, to be honest, I probably haven't taken a picture with my flash in over a year, and I never carry it in my bag around Bangkok...but I do have it, and for those rare occasions, I will mount it on the camera....here are some examples...

Calcutta....India
2232329260_92fb4e392e_b.jpg


Saigon...Vietnam
3572256492_0c452f26c1_o.jpg


cheers....michael
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom