Leica LTM Leica I Finder Lenslet or finder needed !

Leica M39 screw mount bodies/lenses
Gee, stone silence now ! Only $1400 ? I hope that didn't scare eveyone away :)

Well I think Leica worship is kind of crazy too, but I don't make the rules in this world !

So you see I had to take this one to eBay. Most of the folks here actually use cameras to take pictures! (so quaint !)
 
Sorry, David - I was offline until now. Thank you for posting a price.

Not so much different from the cost of a clean M6 body, so who knows - you may just find a buyer here!
 
My apologies, David. I forgot that the front element from someone to DAG to you was made by Leitz. Shouldn't its being, er, well matured add to its value?
 
Yes, well I suppose I could have made a big deal about it on the eBay ad copy (it is eBay item 7625343250), but I am growing weary of this little camera and just want to move it !

Had I lived in the 30's I'd probably have been a Contax owner. I find so much about the Leica world to border on pretension and almost the absurd -- even when reading their vintage 30's literature. It's like a cult thing. FYI I own a IIIf too, so I am speaking from a POV of experience. (...I am bracing myself for the expected return volleys from furious Leica collectors now ...)
 
David, you'll find the same sort of absurdities in the Contax world: but that is far smaller and therefore far less visible than the Leica world is. In their pursuit of perfection, Zeiss made some wonderfully innovative and logically sound designs. The execution of those designs, however, suffered on account of their complexity. Leitz strove for ingenuity coupled with simplicity, which made their products close to indestructible and considerably easier to service. Then, while Leitz could continue their work uninterrupted after WW2, Zeiss were split between eastern and western zones. Production of somewhat simplified Contaxes was resumed in the western zone, but greater attention was given to SLRs. The Contaflex was a sort of dead end, while the Contarex was at once a curious mixture of the future and the dinosaur. In the field of optics, though, Zeiss were ahead so long as they held the patents for hard coating. After WW2, coating technologies were made available to the Japanese, for example, but remained under patent protection in W. Germany. Thus you find Zeiss lenses less prone to flare and capable of much greater contrast than Leitz ones, which, however, were superior in terms of resolving power. The soft glass and soft coatings (dripped, I believe) of Leitz were also easy to destroy. It should not surprise us that Nikon optics, which first imitated and then improved upon those of Zeiss, became so popular with press photographers: newspapers could (and can) reproduce only "punch", not detail and fine gradations.

Zeiss too were practitioners of printed and real absurdity in the 1930s. To beat their fastest shutter speed of 1/500 sec., Leitz came up with 1/1000 sec.; and then Zeiss hit back with 1/1250 sec. Both will have known that mechanical shutters routinely showed, at speeds or [EDIT = of] that order, errors of 25 per cent or more.

The Contax, then, did not survive because it was not quite so fit. Wonder which camera Darwin used.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom