CrisR
Well-known
Until sensor units become near-disposable, drop-in units, made by a variety of companies to fit a standardised "slot" in digital bodies, digital cameras will always suffer this fate.
At the moment, the sensors are one of, if not THE, most expensive components to make, they're one of the main differentiating features of one camera to another, require a lot of electronics to support them, and only recently became "affordable" full frame. We're still seeing a lot of development in them. As a result, we're not likely to see the interchangeable, standardised sensor packages anytime soon, but I can see why it would be desirable to develop, should the industry go that direction.
Every current digital camera will share the same fate as the M8, it's part of the deal.
At the moment, the sensors are one of, if not THE, most expensive components to make, they're one of the main differentiating features of one camera to another, require a lot of electronics to support them, and only recently became "affordable" full frame. We're still seeing a lot of development in them. As a result, we're not likely to see the interchangeable, standardised sensor packages anytime soon, but I can see why it would be desirable to develop, should the industry go that direction.
Every current digital camera will share the same fate as the M8, it's part of the deal.
Black
Photographer.
Crappy ISO? White balance issues? Improving the UI? Adding features? Noooo, that would be far too ... Fuji.
They would rather just implement these features in a new product and take more of your money - I mean, why spend £5k on one camera and expect a reasonable amount of timely and sensible and proportionately costed (God help me, even free in some cases) support when you can spend £10k on two cameras and expect none? What was I thinking?
Black
Photographer.
I don't hate Leica. I am just as apathetic regarding their (digital) products as they are with their customers.
Michael Markey
Veteran
What a shame for those who have saved up and bought the cameras and the dealers who still have second hand stock sitting on their shelves..
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Having owned an M8.. the one thing I'd say that wasn't solidly built was the Kodak sensor.
Just my opinion but I would say "good riddance" to that sensor.
Cheers,
Dave
ath
Well-known
The same happened to my 5D. But:
1. I would have been far more impressed if Canon had it designed properly. My mirror detached at the beginning of a 3 weeks vacation in Nepal leaving me more than 2 weeks with my backup camera only.
2. Re-glueing a mirror and reinforcing it with L-brackets is hardly comparable to a sensor replacement. Neither in cost nor in part stocking and labour.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Ah well .... just think of all the lovely Leica paper weights to be had as time goes by!
Bobfrance
Over Exposed
Michael Markey
Veteran
I think at least part of the problem is that they continue to trade based on unrealistic customer expectations of the product in full knowledge that they may not be met.
It seems ridiculous to encourage this view by continually referencing a period when your products were built to last and then being surprised that your customers are then disappointed those expectations are not met.
Not that there is any evidence that the company is at all surprised or even concerned .
It seems ridiculous to encourage this view by continually referencing a period when your products were built to last and then being surprised that your customers are then disappointed those expectations are not met.
Not that there is any evidence that the company is at all surprised or even concerned .
Gid
Well-known
Leica's current M9 and M9P have the following strap line "Compact, Built for a Lifetime, and Enduring in Value" followed by
"It is not rare for a Leica to become its owner's lifelong companion. This also applies to the digital Leica M9 and equally to the M9-P:"
They will need to be sure of their ongoing support for the above to be true. we will have to wait and see
"It is not rare for a Leica to become its owner's lifelong companion. This also applies to the digital Leica M9 and equally to the M9-P:"
They will need to be sure of their ongoing support for the above to be true. we will have to wait and see
Michael Markey
Veteran
Leica's current M9 and M9P have the following strap line "Compact, Built for a Lifetime, and Enduring in Value" followed by
"It is not rare for a Leica to become its owner's lifelong companion. This also applies to the digital Leica M9 and equally to the M9-P:"
They will need to be sure of their ongoing support for the above to be true. we will have to wait and see
Yes , exactly the thing I was thinking about.
My advice would be stop pointing the gun at your foot.
dogberryjr
[Pithy phrase]
Maybe rip out the guts and make them into film bodies.Ah well .... just think of all the lovely Leica paper weights to be had as time goes by!
(Note to all wet blankets: I am being humorous, please don't point out all the technical impossibilities here.)
kbg32
neo-romanticist
"KODAK KAF-10500 image sensor was developed specifically for use with the M8, and marks Kodak’s second collaboration with Leica."
You'd be living in the dark ages if you think something wasn't going to happen after Kodak went under and sold off their sensor division to Platinum Equity. (http://www.kodak.com/ek/US/en/Kodak_Sells_Image_Sensor_Business_to_Platinum_Equity.htm) It's a damn shame. I still have my M8 as backup to my M9. I haven't heard of many sensor fails in M8s as I have heard of and experienced for myself in M9s. Many problems in M8s seem to stem from shutter faults and LCD fails over time. Though I can imagine a plethora of other problems as well.
You'd be living in the dark ages if you think something wasn't going to happen after Kodak went under and sold off their sensor division to Platinum Equity. (http://www.kodak.com/ek/US/en/Kodak_Sells_Image_Sensor_Business_to_Platinum_Equity.htm) It's a damn shame. I still have my M8 as backup to my M9. I haven't heard of many sensor fails in M8s as I have heard of and experienced for myself in M9s. Many problems in M8s seem to stem from shutter faults and LCD fails over time. Though I can imagine a plethora of other problems as well.
rscheffler
Well-known
IMO, it should be pretty obvious to anyone in digital photography for the past decade or so, that eventually manufacturers cease support for older products, despite whatever advertising fluff the marketing department dreamed up to sell the product.
As already mentioned, Leica is not unique in regards to ending support. What I have not seen offered by others, or at least Canon, which I've used for decades, is a discount towards a replacement. Though I would be surprised to see Leica officially announce such a discount.
Digital cameras are disposable, no matter how well they're physically made. All of my Canon 1D cameras were built like tanks (and priced similarly to Leica's cameras), which theoretically should endure decades of service. But the digital guts were always obsolete in 2-3 years anyway. So why build them this way? Why continue the Leica camera build quality in the digital era? Because it serves a purpose while the camera is in use. It's durable and also feels great in hand. Isn't that one reason why we all bought Leicas? They simply feel great, in addition to meeting other photographic expectations we each specifically have. It's an immediately satisfying experience.
After several 18-24 month Canon 1D upgrade cycles, I accepted that any digital camera in such a price range, including Leica, will result in a sizable annual depreciation and eventually will be worth close to nothing. That the M8 still sells in the $2000 range is frankly amazing to me. But perhaps this rumour, if true, will finally knock the value down to a realistic amount.
Where that advertising fluff from Leica may still retain some truth is in regards to their lenses. These are currently still all mechanical designs that should be usable and serviceable for decades. I can't say the same is true with other brands, most of which are electronically augmented with AF and aperture control. Eventually support for those ceases (seems 5-7 years after discontinuation is the average now). Aren't lenses *the* draw of the Leica system anyway? It's where the majority of my 'investment' (knowing that the purchase of camera equipment is rarely something that increases in value) in Leica is. The cameras I expect to depreciate rapidly. The lenses not so much.
As already mentioned, Leica is not unique in regards to ending support. What I have not seen offered by others, or at least Canon, which I've used for decades, is a discount towards a replacement. Though I would be surprised to see Leica officially announce such a discount.
Digital cameras are disposable, no matter how well they're physically made. All of my Canon 1D cameras were built like tanks (and priced similarly to Leica's cameras), which theoretically should endure decades of service. But the digital guts were always obsolete in 2-3 years anyway. So why build them this way? Why continue the Leica camera build quality in the digital era? Because it serves a purpose while the camera is in use. It's durable and also feels great in hand. Isn't that one reason why we all bought Leicas? They simply feel great, in addition to meeting other photographic expectations we each specifically have. It's an immediately satisfying experience.
After several 18-24 month Canon 1D upgrade cycles, I accepted that any digital camera in such a price range, including Leica, will result in a sizable annual depreciation and eventually will be worth close to nothing. That the M8 still sells in the $2000 range is frankly amazing to me. But perhaps this rumour, if true, will finally knock the value down to a realistic amount.
Where that advertising fluff from Leica may still retain some truth is in regards to their lenses. These are currently still all mechanical designs that should be usable and serviceable for decades. I can't say the same is true with other brands, most of which are electronically augmented with AF and aperture control. Eventually support for those ceases (seems 5-7 years after discontinuation is the average now). Aren't lenses *the* draw of the Leica system anyway? It's where the majority of my 'investment' (knowing that the purchase of camera equipment is rarely something that increases in value) in Leica is. The cameras I expect to depreciate rapidly. The lenses not so much.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Alas, it would. I discussed it at some length at the factory. They may have exaggerated, but I don't think they were lying. They didn't say it was impossible: just not cost-effective. The cost of stripping and reinstalling would be very high indeed, and of course the M typ 240 and previous digi-Ms are very different beasts.
Cheers,
R.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
"Expect . . . soon" ISN'T a malevolent fantasy? Why should we expect it soon? It'll happen sooner or later, sure, but why "soon"?
Cheers,
R.
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Yep.. not just digital photography - digital ANYTHING. Look at any other equipment that is digital or "non-analog" - support eventually ends.
It's easy enough, with cameras if analog, to find someone to repair/tinker/fix etc. but try doing that with older digital equipment. Good luck. Find the nearest garbage pile and drop the thing into it.
Which brings up another issue with digital cameras (and digital stuff in general) - surely some of these can be recycled? (even, as Keith suggested, paperweights
)We can't keep "throwing away" this stuff ad infinituum...
Cheers,
Dave
Sparrow
Veteran
... thankfully; I find the sound of hairs being split slightly preferable to someone dragging their fingernails across blue slate
35photo
Well-known
I've been a Leica user for a pretty long time, the R3 was my first camera my dad gave me to use..brought my M6 11 years ago or so..I remember when the M8 first came out read everything about it good and bad and so on with the M9..I felt these Leica digitals were nice but not built to last they had too many issues that many people were talking about. But I still wanted one M9, found one at a slightly used price went tried it out with my 35mm f2 ASPH started seeing the red edge or red shift with this lens, but not my 50..Decided not to by it based on the red shift thing..Then a 1 year or so later I'm still wanting one found one that was well used at a dealer that Leica just serviced and decided to give it a go..Its been great thus far! I'm not sure how long it will last, but I'm not worried about it..I thing I do know the lenses will out last must of us.. I wouldn't pay full price for one, just got out have fun and shot..
semi-ambivalent
Little to say
Look at the incredible work being done out there today (or for the last hundred years). If you have room for improvement it's not your using film that is holding you back.
s-a