I think from your photo that your lens has the disease I'm afraid. Youxin normally will only work on classic old lenses and is careful about what he takes on. I understand that TE disease
can be fixed if it is caught in the
very early stages, but that certainly doesn't look like the case here.
🙁 I would try sending your photo to DAG and asking his opinion, I'll bet he's seen a few of these in his time. Worth a try anyway.
As I recall, the problem is that the rear elements of this lens are a sealed unit, discontinued, and way too expensive to replace. Much cheaper to buy a new lens for $400-450. I think about 5-6% of the total production was estimated to be affected. There is more on the subject at this link:
What does TE disease look like?
With respect to serial nrs., I seem to recall that when I bought mine (about 2 years ago) the current theory FWIW was that if you bought a lens with a serial nr. >=32xxxxx then it should be OK; any serial nr. lower than that was suspect. All I can say is that on the basis of a sample of one (serial nr. 3378xxx) that one lens is still crystal clear although I do check it every time I read a thread like this.
I am really sorry to be the bearer of bad news and I feel your pain, the thin TE is truly a very special little lens that deserves a much better reputation than it currently has. If this happened to me I would almost certainly buy another one. I would also strongly recommend to you the Konica Hexanon-M 90mm/f2.8, if you are unfamiliar with this lens there is one currently on sale on eBay = please see the link below. I have no connection with the seller.
Konica 90/2.8 M Hexanon RF Lens Hexar Leica