Leica Third-Party Lens Review

bmattock said:
A. Schacht was located in Ulm, Germany. I believe the production of my lenses was somewhere around the late 1950's, but I could be wrong. They were not particularly well-regarded at the time.
Bill Mattocks

Exactly so. I wanted to buy a Schacht lens for my Leica-copy Tower RF camera in the early 1970's - new - and the salesman in the NY store informed me that it was garbage, maybe worse! I didn't buy it and later heard similar opinions about Schacht lens. Sometimes conventional wisdom isn't all it should be. Schacht is obviously better than the rumors suggested.

Walker
 
doubs43 said:
Exactly so. I wanted to buy a Schacht lens for my Leica-copy Tower RF camera in the early 1970's - new - and the salesman in the NY store informed me that it was garbage, maybe worse! I didn't buy it and later heard similar opinions about Schacht lens. Sometimes conventional wisdom isn't all it should be. Schacht is obviously better than the rumors suggested.

Walker

Well, I can only speak for myself and my experiences, of course. I find the build quality on mine to be high - although the lenses are obviously made of aluminum (very light weight), the fit and finish is exemplary - a nice rich shiny black. Now, they may not make a good knock-about lens - I would wager that they would not hold up well in a war zone - and many Leica lenses (and Nikkors, et al) did in fact end up in war zones.

As to the image quality - well, I feel that they speak for themselves. Yes, there are points I like better about my Canon lenses - and overall, they may be the tiniest bit sharper. But I like the overall sharpness and contrast on my Schachts (especially the 90mm) and I feel that between the size and weight, and the fact that they take 48mm filters just like my Canon 50mm f1.4, combine to make them my favorite 'kit' lenses - they tend to go with me when I pack the Bessa to gad about.

I bought my first A. Schacht Travenar at Central Camera in Chicago last Christmas. At the time, I had only two LTM lenses - a Russian Industar 50mm and a Canon 135mm f3.5. I wanted something in between 50 and 135, so I was offered a choice of two lenses: This 90mm Travenar and a new 75mm f2.5 CV Color-Heliar. Both more or less the same price. The Travenar was obviously very old, but essentially unused in the original box.

I checked both carefully. One thing that I noticed was that the Travenar had more aperture blades than the CV 75mm. I thought it would make better OOF effects. And I thought that the 90mm would be an ideal portrait length. So I got the Travenar. Did I make a mistake? Dunno!

Haven't regretted it, but have gotten the other Schachts for MUCH less money on eBoy - nobody likes these things - what a shame, but good for me!

They have held up well for me - and I am more than satisfied with both mechanical quality and image quality. And they look nice, which is good.

I have seen the older Schachts - silver tubes that resemble the Steinheils and the Hektors - I don't really want one of those. I like the shorter black ones that I have.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
 
Back
Top Bottom