tritiated
Well-known
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI....m=170247377927&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=007
I realise I am being pedantic, but to me this looks like a leitz minolta CL version M-rokkor 40/2 (single coated), not the multicoated CLE version. Am I mistaken?
I expect it doesn't matter in the end (unless one is concerned with cams, amount of coating etc.), but do the CLE versions go for a few more quid?
....now to think of an interesting and worthwhile story to post..hoho
I realise I am being pedantic, but to me this looks like a leitz minolta CL version M-rokkor 40/2 (single coated), not the multicoated CLE version. Am I mistaken?
I expect it doesn't matter in the end (unless one is concerned with cams, amount of coating etc.), but do the CLE versions go for a few more quid?
....now to think of an interesting and worthwhile story to post..hoho
Palaeoboy
Joel Matherson
Its definitely the earlier Rokkor from a Leitz Minolta CL not a CLE version as he implies. These are usually the cheapest of the 40mm f2's. The CLE version and Summicrons just fetch a fraction more.