Lens with 3D look

[stephen.w]

I could, but I have the belly feeling that you're goamules' sock puppet, hence: no, I won't show you anything.

Apologies, I only read the original post before I did so myself. I would be genuinely interested in seeing your comparisons.

 

[lawrence]

No offence intended Lawrence, I didn't mean "you must prove this." I just meant if "one wanted to, they'd have to do this." Otherwise, it's subjective "beliefs" not based on any fact.

It's based on my own observation, which is enough of a fact for me. If you want to believe 'alternative facts', that's fine too 😉

 

[kuuan]

curiosity made me go out and take fast and dirty ( handheld, A mode, auto ISO ) comparison shots
an old manual prime and 28-70mm kit zoom on Sony A7 set at the same focal lenghts, all @f4.

e.g.:

Untitled by kuuan's lens tests, on Flickr

Untitled by kuuan's lens tests, on Flickr

the question certainly would deserve a better job, please pardon me.
nevertheless I am curious if anyone can see a difference regarding 3D impression ( if there is any at all..)

14 pairs of pics: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuanslenstests/sets/72157683935481805/with/33908018233/
( for now view of EXIFs is disabled, as if one couldn't tell which is which.., shall make that available again soon )

 

[fotomeow]

so subjective, but the medium format Pentax 67 has ALWAYS caught my attention with its images

... even though I haven't owned one. Even an average fotog wouldn't have much trouble shooting some 3D-esque images with this get up

 

[newst]

I personally don't believe that the "3D effect" is lens dependent. This image is from a Sony A6500 with a rather mundane Minolta Rokkor-X 2.0/45 kit lens: