MaxElmar
Well-known
Interesting Review from Lenstip of the 10-24. Wow - they really hit it out of the park at 10mm. Not so much at 24mm.... But who buys a wide zoom for the long end?
http://www.lenstip.com/413.1-Lens_review-Fujifilm_Fujinon_XF_10-24_mm_f_4R_OIS_Introduction.html
It's also quite a porker. Big, fat, and heavy. But you want a high-performance zoom, that's the price you pay.
http://www.lenstip.com/413.1-Lens_review-Fujifilm_Fujinon_XF_10-24_mm_f_4R_OIS_Introduction.html
It's also quite a porker. Big, fat, and heavy. But you want a high-performance zoom, that's the price you pay.
willie_901
Veteran
I use this lens a lot. This is a fair review.
My example outperforms the Nikkor FX 17-35/2.8, and 16-35/4, DX 12-24/4 and Tokina 11-16/2.8 lenses I've owned in edge sharpness, corrected barrel distortion (mostly first order) and ghosting.The lateral CA is a bit higher than the 16-35/4 though LR corrects this without any fiddling around.
I typically use/used these lenses at 14mm (APS-C) or 20 mm (FX) at F 5.6 to F 10. I have noticed the Fujinon is surprisingly useful at 10 mm. With the other WA zooms I would never use them at their shortest possible focal length because all aspects of IQ seem to drop off rapidly at the end of the zoom range.
My example outperforms the Nikkor FX 17-35/2.8, and 16-35/4, DX 12-24/4 and Tokina 11-16/2.8 lenses I've owned in edge sharpness, corrected barrel distortion (mostly first order) and ghosting.The lateral CA is a bit higher than the 16-35/4 though LR corrects this without any fiddling around.
I typically use/used these lenses at 14mm (APS-C) or 20 mm (FX) at F 5.6 to F 10. I have noticed the Fujinon is surprisingly useful at 10 mm. With the other WA zooms I would never use them at their shortest possible focal length because all aspects of IQ seem to drop off rapidly at the end of the zoom range.
MaxElmar
Well-known
Willie_901 : do you use the Fuji 14/2.8 as well? If so, would you say it's comparable to the zoom at that focal length?